Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Didn't get an ideal result on object tracking. #9

Open
BIGJUN777 opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Didn't get an ideal result on object tracking. #9

BIGJUN777 opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@BIGJUN777
Copy link

BIGJUN777 commented Nov 30, 2018

Hello:

In the past two weeks, I mainly use the particle_tracker on my jobs, I successfully run the package in ROS and realized object-tracking. But I couldn't get the ideal result you showed in your video. What I get are

  1. the marker couldn't track the object in real time,
  2. and if moving the object faster it will miss the track.

Actually, now I just run the code in CPU because there is something wrong with the GPU. So I want to know something about the parameters you provided in the particle_tracker.yaml. That says, can I change these parameters to get a more ideal result? Are these the more suitable parameters you had tested? Or Do you have some good idea on this?

Thanks!

@BIGJUN777
Copy link
Author

Hello:

I come across another problem. When I tried to use the gaussian_tracker, It was strange that the marker just fixed at the original place, instead of tracing the object. I just modified the object.yaml file for the target object. Do you know how to solve this?

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant