-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
COPD-MICCAI 2018] Apply the Sub2Vec method on new data from the hard drive #54
Comments
@sumedhasingla would you please update this issue. Thanks. |
@sumedhasingla in the previous run, did you include the covariates to the network or it had only imaging? The results from #57 show that the new features do help in predicting exacerbation. We might need to add exacerbation to the learning too (FEV1, FEVC, exacerbation). We should think about what loss function is appropriate for that task. Talk to @jrahimik and @mgong2 about it. Either one-class loss or loss of the positive-label learning can help there. |
@Kayhan, In previous run, we are only predicting FEV1 and FVC. |
There were some nan- issues in the earlier run of the cross validation experiments. The Nan issue is now fixed. We are waiting for our PSC reservation to execute cross validation. |
In current implementation, one epoch is taking 5 hours to complete. We need to run about 25 epochs, so it will take 5 days to complete 1 experiment. |
@sumedhasingla Thanks for the update. If you get the multi-GPU working (in any way), this will be a major breakthrough for many of our project. Thanks for pushing for that. Regarding your comment on FEV1, FEVC: yes I know. My question is that did network concatenated Age, gender, the pack of smoking with |
The cross-validation with lambda_1 = 10 is completed. |
Compare results on Sharp vs standard images
Apply the methods as it is on the Phase -1
Compare results on INSP only vs INSP + EXP images
Repeat experiments while incorporating phase-2 images
Perform 5 fold cross validation of the method as it is on Phase 1
Repeat exploratory analysis on the cross validation data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: