-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some significant chemical clusters omitted in impact plots #20
Comments
Which chemrich function are you using ? |
I used run_chemrich_chemical_classes() on t-test results, inputting compound name, smiles, p-values, effect-size, and sub-pathway information as 'set'. |
This line has the filtering criteria : cluster p-value should be < 0.05, cluster size should be at least 2 and significant metabolites within a cluster should be at least 2. This might explain the difference. |
I see. But I think for some reason clusters whose p-values = 0.05 were also included in my result. Thank you! |
I noticed there were fewer significant (p-values smaller than 0.05) clusters displayed in the impact plot than those in the excel file. For example, in my analysis, there are 25 significant clusters in the generated excel file, but there are only 21 clusters in the impact plot displayed. Is there a specific standard for dropping certain clusters besides looking at p-values only?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: