Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add guix-forge #226

Open
jgarte opened this issue Oct 1, 2023 · 9 comments
Open

Add guix-forge #226

jgarte opened this issue Oct 1, 2023 · 9 comments
Labels
addition Adding new software to the list reviewers wanted Awaiting reviews
Milestone

Comments

@jgarte
Copy link

jgarte commented Oct 1, 2023

name: "guix-forge"
website_url: "https://guix-forge.systemreboot.net/manual/dev/en/"
source_code_url: "https://git.systemreboot.net/guix-forge/"
description: "guix-forge is a Guix service that lets you run a complete software forge in the manner of GitHub"
licenses:
  - GPLv3+
platforms:
  - Scheme
tags:
  - Automation
depends_3rdparty: no
demo_url: https://archive.org/details/arun-isaac-on-guix-forge

To ensure your issue is dealt with swiftly, please check the following (check the boxes [x]):

  • [x ] Submit one item per pull issue. This eases reviewing and speeds up inclusion.
  • [x ] You have searched the repository for any relevant issues or PRs, including closed ones.
  • [x ] Any software you are adding is not already listed at any of awesome-sysadmin, staticgen.com, staticsitegenerators.net, dbdb.io.
  • [x ] Any software project you are adding to the list is actively maintained.
  • [x ] Any software project you are adding was first released more than 4 months ago.
  • [x ] Any software project you are adding has working installation instructions.
  • [ x] If you are adding software forked from another active project, please provide/link to a clear list of differences between both.
@jgarte jgarte added the addition Adding new software to the list label Oct 1, 2023
@nodiscc nodiscc added the reviewers wanted Awaiting reviews label Oct 2, 2023
@kokomo123
Copy link
Collaborator

kokomo123 commented Oct 2, 2023

Regarding the demo being on the Internet Archive that's just a video, could you consider moving it to an actual demo of the software on your website? If that's not feasible, then that's fine. other then that, I looked through and couldn't seem to find a stable release. only the repository itself has a release nor there's a web ui, only CLI. Is there a stable tag, etc for the user to use instead of having to pull from the main branch everytime? Considering these questions, i shall await a response. Thanks

@arunisaac
Copy link

Hi there! I am the maintainer of the guix-forge project. Thanks, @jgarte, for contributing it to awesome-selfhosted!

I could embed the Internet Archive video in the guix-forge home page. Would that help?

About releases: guix-forge is a channel for GNU Guix. See https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Channels.html Guix channels don't usually have releases or tags, and it is customary for users to pull from the main branch everytime using guix pull.

@arunisaac
Copy link

Also, guix-forge is a CLI tool. It is meant to install and maintain (on your self-hosted server) other tools such as laminar CI, cgit, etc. that come with a web UI.

@kokomo123
Copy link
Collaborator

kokomo123 commented Oct 2, 2023

@nodiscc what do you think of this?
Thanks for responding by the way arun!

@kokomo123
Copy link
Collaborator

kokomo123 commented Oct 2, 2023

Hi there! I am the maintainer of the guix-forge project. Thanks, @jgarte, for contributing it to awesome-selfhosted!

I could embed the Internet Archive video in the guix-forge home page. Would that help?

About releases: guix-forge is a channel for GNU Guix. See https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Channels.html Guix channels don't usually have releases or tags, and it is customary for users to pull from the main branch everytime using guix pull.

I meant, is there a plan to create a demo like laminar CI, cgit, etc for people to try out before installing on their own devices? sorta like other FOSS software that's time based or limited in functionality. Also embedding the video will definitely help instead of a outside source so it's clear and center.

@Ki-er
Copy link
Collaborator

Ki-er commented Oct 2, 2023

I cant remember where the source is however demos should be interactive. Not videos.

Therefore the video demo should be removed.

@nodiscc
Copy link
Member

nodiscc commented Oct 3, 2023

don't usually have releases or tags, and it is customary for users to pull from the main branch everytime

😕 terrible practice for multiple reasons (no warning for breaking changes, software changing behavior on upgrades without admin approval, etc).

The first commit dates back to 2021 but there is no way to know which version is the first "usable/working" one. I think the best course of action, is to tag the current version as 1.0.0 and wait for 4 months before submitting it.

demos should be interactive.

This is correct, we used to have this guideline written down in https://github.com/awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted but I can't find it here. https://github.com/awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted/blob/ae5aa43f54f46e75ed522a065d3133401ed736b2/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

demo links should only be used for interactive demos, i.e. not video demonstrations.

If someone wants to take the time to add it back to https://github.com/awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted-data/blob/master/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md it would be appreciated.

@nodiscc nodiscc added needs to mature Project is younger than 4 months and removed reviewers wanted Awaiting reviews labels Oct 3, 2023
@arunisaac
Copy link

arunisaac commented Oct 5, 2023 via email

@Ki-er
Copy link
Collaborator

Ki-er commented Oct 18, 2023

To be revisited: 5 February 2024

@kokomo123 kokomo123 added the on hold Issue/PR should be revisited later label Oct 18, 2023
@Rabenherz112 Rabenherz112 added reviewers wanted Awaiting reviews and removed needs to mature Project is younger than 4 months on hold Issue/PR should be revisited later labels Feb 23, 2024
@nodiscc nodiscc added this to the backlog milestone Mar 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
addition Adding new software to the list reviewers wanted Awaiting reviews
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants