-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Convert VAD to Ekman #31
Comments
The VAD model is only fine-tuned on the MSP-Podcast dataset, which has several shortcomings for a full blown VAD model:
Having this in mind I would propose to be very carefully when trying to map the VAD values to emotional categories. Another way might be to further fine-tune the model on a given database containing the desired emotional categories, or using the embeddings of the model to train a simple classifier on such a database like we do in the notebook under the "https://github.com/audeering/w2v2-how-to/blob/main/notebook.ipynb" section. |
Thanks a million for the clarifications. In general, the conversion from VAD to Ekman seems to provide useful results: https://github.com/mirix/approaches-to-diarisation/tree/main/emotions However, it is true that fear is never detected. I will see what other models are available and pay more attention to which datasets were used. |
Hi @hagenw I have forked MOSEI for SER: https://huggingface.co/datasets/mirix/messaih https://github.com/mirix/messaih Now I will try to train a model and test it in a real-life scenario. |
Hello,
This model provides VAD values in 3D space.
However, the Ekman model is more intuitive to share the results with users.
I have found papers with 3D representations hinting at how to perform this conversion.
Are you aware of a straightforward approach to perform the conversion between both models?
Ideally in Python, but any hint on the algorithm would also do.
Best,
Ed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: