Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Slippage is 100x higher than it should be #63

Open
jbowen93 opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Slippage is 100x higher than it should be #63

jbowen93 opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@jbowen93
Copy link
Member

When swapping 3.2 USDC for 1 TIA with 0.1% slippage the UI shows that the minimum TIA received before reversion is 0.892 which is 10% slippage.

When setting slippage to 0.3% the UI shows minimum TIA received is 0.694 which is 30% slippage.

Image Image
@jbowen93 jbowen93 added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 13, 2025
@steezeburger steezeburger removed the bug Something isn't working label Feb 13, 2025
@steezeburger steezeburger self-assigned this Feb 13, 2025
@steezeburger
Copy link
Member

Noticed some other issues around exactIn vs exactOut that got in my way of debugging slippage values for exactOut.
I believe all of that has been fixed in another PR that will be merged soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants