You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was reviewing the custom media queries defined in the CSS, and I noticed an inconsistency in the naming convention used for the size ranges. Specifically, the naming for the --xxs-n-above and --xxs-n-below queries seems to be misrepresenting the actual size ranges they cover.
The --xxs-n-above query is defined as (width >= 240px), which technically covers the range of "XS and Above" rather than "XXS and Above" as the name suggests. Similarly, the --xxs-n-below query covers the range of "XXS and Below", but the name might suggest it excludes the XXS range.
I would like to propose a revision in the naming convention to accurately represent the size ranges each query covers. For instance, renaming --xxs-n-above to --xs-n-above and adjusting other similar query names accordingly would provide a clearer understanding of the size ranges they represent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I was reviewing the custom media queries defined in the CSS, and I noticed an inconsistency in the naming convention used for the size ranges. Specifically, the naming for the --xxs-n-above and --xxs-n-below queries seems to be misrepresenting the actual size ranges they cover.
Here's the relevant code snippet:
The --xxs-n-above query is defined as (width >= 240px), which technically covers the range of "XS and Above" rather than "XXS and Above" as the name suggests. Similarly, the --xxs-n-below query covers the range of "XXS and Below", but the name might suggest it excludes the XXS range.
I would like to propose a revision in the naming convention to accurately represent the size ranges each query covers. For instance, renaming --xxs-n-above to --xs-n-above and adjusting other similar query names accordingly would provide a clearer understanding of the size ranges they represent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: