You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Convergence of the simulation of margins of error for the output values is something that has not been looked at at all for this software. If it is not possible to provide quantitative error sizes for the outputs i think the next best option would be to at least have a indicator of convergence or stability. Or at the very least provide a tutorial that explains the factors and parameters contributing to convergence and errors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think there could be a tutorial about convergences. I'll draft my thoughts about it here first. Basically, there are two main convergences, with time and with the number of phonons.
Convergence with number of phonons is easy to demonstrate by plotting it for 10, 100, 1000 phonons etc. This is the responsibility of the user, but there could be an example. I'll take an example from Kim's paper when it's published.
Convergence with time is a bit harder, it's related to issue timesteps behaviour #13. I'll think how to make it so that we still record some data to show the convergence. For the quantities like the thermal conductivity, the standard deviation can be estimated either by rerunning the simulation N times (responsibility of the user and what I did in some works in the past) or considering N last converged values of the quantity (responsibility of the program).
Also, there could be a module that creates plots with convergence after the program has finished. Since for some quantities we have data for all phonons, we could simply plot curves for all phonons, for 10% phonons, for 1% phonons etc. This could be used to see the convergence for MFP and things like that. That seems easy to make.
Convergence of the simulation of margins of error for the output values is something that has not been looked at at all for this software. If it is not possible to provide quantitative error sizes for the outputs i think the next best option would be to at least have a indicator of convergence or stability. Or at the very least provide a tutorial that explains the factors and parameters contributing to convergence and errors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: