Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Windows] [Feature request] Add subdomain support in split tunneling settings #1381

Closed
Doroschenkov opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@Doroschenkov
Copy link

Good day!
I propose adding the ability to specify multiple subdomains in the split tunneling whitelist using a single entry.
Let me give you an example: I need to specify all the subdomains of the googlevideo.com resource, but the names of the third-level domains and their number are unknown in advance. Alternatively, from the user's point of view, it would be convenient to specify the following construction "*.googlevideo.com" so that the application sends to the tunnel everything that goes to any domain that ends with googlevideo.com.

This can be implemented by dynamically generating whitelists for the tunnel, however, this will require rebuilding the application and separating the modules directly responsible for maintaining the tunnel and for redirecting packets so that they do not depend on each other. This will require significant changes in the architecture and will increase the hardware requirements, but it will provide the user with more flexible functionality in configuring rules for directing traffic, and will also remove restrictions on editing split tunneling parameters when the tunnel has already been created.

And on the other hand, shouldn't it be initially possible to specify subdomains for a certain resource in order to direct everything related to it to the tunnel? As an ordinary person, it seems to me that such functionality is in high demand among VPN users

@Nethius Nethius closed this as completed Feb 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants