Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prefLabel of all referenced AAT concepts must be loaded #9

Open
VladimirAlexiev opened this issue Mar 31, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

prefLabel of all referenced AAT concepts must be loaded #9

VladimirAlexiev opened this issue Mar 31, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link
Member

american-art/PUAM#43 got me thinking.

@workergnome, do you plan to grep all AAC data, find AAT references, and then fetch or define their prefLabel?

  • Getty prefers gvp:prefLabelGVP/xl:literalForm but that's plural
  • I think you want the singular (plural only if there's no singular)

http://vocab.getty.edu/doc/#Term_Characteristics lists some that can be useful to you.
Eg this query lists terms and their characteristics for "painting":

select * {
  aat:300033618 xl:prefLabel|xl:altLabel ?l.
  ?l dct:language gvp_lang:en; gvp:term ?term; gvp:termType ?type; gvp:termPOS ?pos; 
}
@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link
Member Author

On second thought, this is better because some terms may be missing some characteristics:

select * {
  aat:300033618 xl:prefLabel|xl:altLabel ?l.
  ?l dct:language gvp_lang:en; gvp:term ?term.
  optional {?l gvp:termType ?type}
  optional {?l gvp:termPOS ?pos}
}

@VladimirAlexiev VladimirAlexiev changed the title fetch AAT labels prefLabel of all referenced AAT concepts must be loaded Jul 25, 2017
@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link
Member Author

@workergnome Please add label "mustfix" (or whatever we called it) to this project and to this issue.

@workergnome
Copy link

Done.

@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link
Member Author

#6 is a duplicate of this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants