Gilcrease Classifications file is outdated

[VladimirAlexiev]

Gilcrease AAC Classification Mapping (8.2.16).xlsx maps "Anth- Ceramic, Plaster" to "materials by composition". This is definitely wrong:

• it's too generic
• it's a facet, not a concept to be used for indexing.

I can't find on google what is this special plaster. But explore the plaster hirerarchy and pick something.

• Perhaps simply aac:300014922 "plaster"
• definitely not the facet "plaster by composition or origin"

[kateblanch]

@Diana-Folsom

[Diana-Folsom]

It sounds like the old, incorrect version of the data is being used. These old, whacky categories should have been deleted in the newer version of data.

[caknoblock]

You can review the version of the data that we are using here: https://github.com/american-art/AAT-Term-Mappings/tree/master/karma/cleaned_data <https://github.com/american-art/AAT-Term-Mappings/tree/master/karma/cleaned_data> and this file can be updated, but it needs to be in this format.

…

On Mar 4, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Diana-Folsom ***@***.***> wrote: It sounds like the old, incorrect version of the data is being used. These old, whacky categories should have been deleted in the newer version of data. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABB-qUvPMFQ9_lPfDNBo4_jIY6WoPQvEks5rigA_gaJpZM4MLKkL>. {"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/american-art/AAT-Term-Mappings","title":"american-art/AAT-Term-Mappings","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in ***@***.*** in #3: It sounds like the old, incorrect version of the data is being used. These old, whacky categories should have been deleted in the newer version of data. "}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"#3 (comment)! 148"}}}

[Diana-Folsom]

Craig,
This is the old file - we updated our data and posted a new file in August, 2016.

Kate,
Is there a different place or way in which we should post the data? I believe we used the same format as the original posting.

Although we not need to make some other Classification changes, I hope that the August data contribution can be the one used now, and we will contribute the changes we are making based on Vladimir's helpful observations.

Thanks!
Diana

[kateblanch]

Hi @Diana-Folsom! Thanks for your help investigating.
I see the file you posted in August - Gilcrease AAC Classification Mapping (8.2.16).xlsx.
Is there a newer one that you posted after August 2nd?

I'm comparing the data Craig's using - https://github.com/american-art/AAT-Term-Mappings/tree/master/karma/cleaned_data/GM Classification.xlsx and this file Gilcrease AAC Classification Mapping (8.2.16).xlsx and they look the same.

Did the classifications get cleaned up at the object level, perhaps?
This file https://github.com/american-art/GM/blob/master/Classifications/Classifications.csv seems to much fewer classifications.