Hi @programskillforverification thanks for your PR

This change would also require an update in Foundry (https://github.com/foundry-rs/foundry/tree/master/crates/anvil) as seen in the CI errors, is this something you would be interested in adding?

cc @grandizzy I think this change is reasonable to be added pre-reth-anvil

Hi @programskillforverification thanks for your PR

This change would also require an update in Foundry (https://github.com/foundry-rs/foundry/tree/master/crates/anvil) as seen in the CI errors, is this something you would be interested in adding?

cc @grandizzy I think this change is reasonable to be added pre-reth-anvil

It looks like that the error is due to type change of NodeEnvironment. I can't found the reason. Maybe I need help.

It looks like that the error is due to type change of NodeEnvironment. I can't found the reason. Maybe I need help.

The error occurs because Alloy uses the anvil binary from Forge for its tests (and also exposes it through crates like node-bindings

It looks like that the error is due to type change of NodeEnvironment. I can't found the reason. Maybe I need help.

The error occurs because Alloy uses the anvil binary from Forge for its tests (and also exposes it through crates like node-bindings

alloy/crates/node-bindings/src/nodes/anvil.rs

Line 258 in ae64f26

let mut cmd = self.program.as_ref().map_or_else(|| Command::new("anvil"), Command::new);

OK...Update anvil in this PR or open a new?

OK...Update anvil in this PR or open a new?

No further changes should be necessary here, the update of the types should happen in https://github.com/foundry-rs/foundry/tree/master/crates/anvil (in Foundry)

OK...Update anvil in this PR or open a new?

No further changes should be necessary here, the update of the types should happen in https://github.com/foundry-rs/foundry/tree/master/crates/anvil (in Foundry)

I see. I will open new PR in Foundry.

This doesn't and shouldn't require an anvil update: we don't want to change the serialization, just the API of the provider.

Please add the corresponding .map() to keep the serialization the same (u64 -> U64 etc.).

Edit: I've done it myself so we can include this in the next release.