We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
To suggest an idea or inquire about a new Message Broker supporting feature or any other enhancement, please follow this template:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Since 0.6, FastStream is going to support MsgSpec (according to https://github.com/Lancetnik/FastDepends/blob/51524261c847998bb3dafe7fc8dff76c23321396/fast_depends/msgspec/serializer.py). But for now, AsyncAPI is build only for Pydantic models, although MsgSpec also supports generating JSON Schema for specific model.
It would be nice if FastStream could generate AsyncAPI for MsgSpec structs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For sure, It is in roadmap
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
To suggest an idea or inquire about a new Message Broker supporting feature or any other enhancement, please follow this template:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Since 0.6, FastStream is going to support MsgSpec (according to https://github.com/Lancetnik/FastDepends/blob/51524261c847998bb3dafe7fc8dff76c23321396/fast_depends/msgspec/serializer.py). But for now, AsyncAPI is build only for Pydantic models, although MsgSpec also supports generating JSON Schema for specific model.
It would be nice if FastStream could generate AsyncAPI for MsgSpec structs.
Describe the solution you'd like
Feature code example
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: