You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Trigger:schedule: weekly or pull_request (on API changes)
Tools Needed:
GitHub API (toolsets: [default])
Bash for compilation and execution
Network defaults for downloading dependencies
Safe Outputs:
create-discussion: Weekly report of example validation results
Implementation Approach:
Build Z3 with all language bindings
Scan examples/ directory for each language
For each example:
Compile (if compiled language)
Execute with timeout
Verify expected output
Report broken examples
Provide fixes or mark as deprecated
Languages to Validate:
Python (~21 examples)
Java (~4 examples)
C# (~1 example)
C/C++ (multiple examples)
OCaml, JavaScript, Rust (as available)
Example Workflow:
---
description: Validate code examples across language bindingson:
schedule: weeklypull_request:
paths:
- 'src/api/**'
- 'examples/**'permissions: read-alltools:
github:
toolsets: [default]bash: [":*"]network: defaultssafe-outputs:
create-discussion:
close-older-discussions: true
---
Build and test examples for all language bindings
Why High Priority:
Critical for user onboarding
Multi-language support is a key Z3 feature
Examples are often first code users see
Promoted from Medium in Run 22, stable since
Status: Unimplemented, stable as High Priority since Run 22 (Jan 23)
Data-driven: Based on analysis of 72 unlabeled issues, existing workflows, and repository patterns
Conservative: Only suggesting workflows with clear value and technical feasibility
Safe: All use safe-outputs, no direct repository writes
Phased: Clear priority levels for gradual adoption
Proven: soundness-bug-detector validates the approach
Next Steps
Review High Priority suggestions - These address critical gaps
Start with Issue Triage Assistant - Highest immediate ROI (72 issues)
Consider Performance Regression Detector - Most requested by stable prioritization
Phased rollout: Implement High → Medium → Low
Feedback welcome: Adjust priorities based on team needs
Questions or Concerns?
Are these priorities aligned with team roadmap?
Any concerns about specific suggestions?
Should any be reprioritized based on current work?
Need more implementation details for any workflow?
🔮 Next Run: January 28, 2026
Focus:
✅ Track if any workflows implemented
✅ Monitor soundness-bug-detector effectiveness
✅ Continue stable suggestions until implementation
✅ Identify any new automation opportunities
✅ Celebrate any new implementations!
This report was automatically generated by the Workflow Suggestion Agent. Suggestions are based on repository analysis, issue/PR patterns, and existing automation gaps.
Run 26 | January 27, 2026 | 5 days since last implementation
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Workflow Suggestions - January 27, 2026
Executive Summary
🎉 Implemented & Active
🔥 High Priority Suggestions
1. Performance Regression Detector ⚡ CRITICAL GAP
Purpose: Automatically detect performance regressions in solver benchmarks when PRs modify solver code
Value:
Trigger:
pull_request(on PRs modifyingsrc/**/*.cpporsrc/**/*.h)Tools Needed:
toolsets: [default])Safe Outputs:
add-comment:Report performance comparison on PRs (max: 3)Implementation Approach:
Example Workflow:
Why High Priority:
Status: Unimplemented, stable suggestion since Run 20 (Jan 21)
2. Issue Triage & Labeling Assistant 🏷️ HIGH ROI
Purpose: Automatically triage and label new issues based on content analysis
Value:
Trigger:
issues(on issue open/edit)Tools Needed:
toolsets: [default])Safe Outputs:
add-labels:Add appropriate labels (max: 10)add-comment:Explain labeling (max: 3)Implementation Approach:
Common Labels to Apply:
bug,enhancement,questionneeds-triage,needs-reproperformance,soundness,APIpython,java,c#, etc.sat-solver,smt-core,arithmetic,strings, etc.Example Workflow:
Why High Priority:
Status: Unimplemented, stable suggestion since Run 20 (Jan 21)
3. Cross-Language Example Validator ✅ QUALITY ASSURANCE
Purpose: Validate that code examples across all 9 language bindings compile and run successfully
Value:
Trigger:
schedule: weeklyorpull_request(on API changes)Tools Needed:
toolsets: [default])Safe Outputs:
create-discussion:Weekly report of example validation resultsImplementation Approach:
examples/directory for each languageLanguages to Validate:
Example Workflow:
Why High Priority:
Status: Unimplemented, stable as High Priority since Run 22 (Jan 23)
⚡ Medium Priority Suggestions
4. Benchmark Performance Tracker 📊 HISTORICAL MONITORING
Purpose: Track Z3 performance over time on standardized benchmarks, creating historical data
Value:
Trigger:
schedule: weeklyTools Needed:
toolsets: [default])Safe Outputs:
create-discussion:Weekly performance report with charts/tablesclose-older-discussions: trueto avoid clutterImplementation Approach:
Example Workflow:
Why Medium Priority:
Status: Unimplemented, stable suggestion since Run 22 (Jan 23)
5. API Breaking Change Detector 🔍 API STABILITY
Purpose: Detect breaking changes to the C API that affect language bindings
Value:
Trigger:
pull_request(on PRs modifyingsrc/api/**)Tools Needed:
toolsets: [default])Safe Outputs:
add-comment:Report API changes on PRs (max: 3)Implementation Approach:
src/api/*.h)Example Workflow:
Why Medium Priority:
Status: Unimplemented, stable suggestion since Run 22 (Jan 23)
6. Academic Paper Citation Tracker 📚 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Purpose: Monitor academic papers citing Z3 and track research impact
Value:
Trigger:
schedule: monthlyTools Needed:
toolsets: [default])Safe Outputs:
create-discussion:Monthly citation reportclose-older-discussions: trueImplementation Approach:
Example Workflow:
Why Medium Priority:
Status: Unimplemented, stable as Medium Priority since Run 22 (Jan 23)
💡 Low Priority Suggestions
7. TODO/FIXME Progress Tracker 📝 TECHNICAL DEBT
Purpose: Track TODO/FIXME comments in codebase and monitor technical debt over time
Value:
Trigger:
schedule: monthlyTools Needed:
toolsets: [default])Safe Outputs:
create-discussion:Monthly TODO reportclose-older-discussions: trueImplementation Approach:
Example Workflow:
Why Low Priority:
Status: Unimplemented, stable as Low Priority since Run 22 (Jan 23)
8. Documentation Freshness Checker 📄 DOC QUALITY
Purpose: Verify that documentation examples and code snippets are up-to-date and working
Value:
Trigger:
schedule: monthlyTools Needed:
toolsets: [default])Safe Outputs:
create-discussion:Monthly documentation health reportclose-older-discussions: trueImplementation Approach:
Example Workflow:
Why Low Priority:
Status: Unimplemented, stable suggestion since Run 22 (Jan 23)
📊 Repository Insights
Current Automation Status
Implemented Workflows (6):
Suggested Workflows (8):
Automation Coverage Projection
Key Statistics
Repository Health Indicators
✅ Strengths:
🎯 Implementation Roadmap
Week 1 (High Priority - Critical Gaps)
Week 2-3 (Medium Priority - Enhanced Monitoring)
Month 2+ (Low Priority - Nice-to-Have)
📈 Progress Tracker
Suggestion Stability
Run History:
Result: 🎉 5 consecutive runs with 100% stable suggestions (Jan 23-27)
This exceptional stability indicates:
Implementation Success
Automation ROI Estimate
If High Priority workflows are implemented:
Total estimated time savings: 10-20 hours per week for maintainers
🎊 Success Indicators
Process Maturity
Suggestion Quality
Implementation Readiness
📝 Notes for Maintainers
Why These Suggestions?
Next Steps
Questions or Concerns?
🔮 Next Run: January 28, 2026
Focus:
This report was automatically generated by the Workflow Suggestion Agent. Suggestions are based on repository analysis, issue/PR patterns, and existing automation gaps.
Run 26 | January 27, 2026 | 5 days since last implementation
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions