Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option to list failures when running in Passive mode #463

Open
mrlacey opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Add option to list failures when running in Passive mode #463

mrlacey opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@mrlacey
Copy link
Contributor

mrlacey commented Jan 18, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

When running the command line version as part of a CI process on a large solution, finding the specific file(s) that has (have) failed often feels slow and frustrating.

Describe the solution you'd like

I'd like to add a --listfailures flag that, if passed (in combination with --passive), will list the failing files at the end of the output.

This way, I wouldn't have to search through the output to find the files that have failed. -- Computers are good at (better than me at) searching for and summarizing things, let's use that to make reviewing the output easier.

Describe alternatives you've considered

  • Continue to do it manually: slow, error-prone, & frustrating.
  • Add something separate in the CI to "process" the output to create the summary list: would leave more to manage and configure and may not be as flexible across platforms and CI platforms.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

None, but I'd be happy to implement it.

@mrlacey
Copy link
Contributor Author

mrlacey commented Apr 9, 2024

X-Ref #400

Maybe add 2 new options:
--listonlyfailures
and
--summarizefailures

will review further before proposing something more complete.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants