Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fully support chat for all project files #6245

Open
fuzyll opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Fully support chat for all project files #6245

fuzyll opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@negasora
Labels
Edition: Ultimate Effort: Low Issue should take < 1 week Impact: Low Issue is a papercut or has a good, supported workaround Type: Enhancement Issue is a small enhancement to existing functionality
Milestone
Gallifrey

Comments

@fuzyll
Copy link
Contributor

fuzyll commented Dec 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

What is the feature you'd like to have?
Right now, chat is supported for .bndbs in remote projects, but not entirely supported for new files or files that aren't a BNDB yet.

Is your feature request related to a problem?
Chat should be supported in all scenarios related to a remote project.

Additional Information:
Split out from an internal issue. We should also make sure to show chat for local databases that have it cached as well.
@fuzyll fuzyll added Type: Enhancement Issue is a small enhancement to existing functionality Impact: Low Issue is a papercut or has a good, supported workaround Effort: Low Issue should take < 1 week Edition: Ultimate labels Dec 10, 2024
@fuzyll fuzyll added this to the Gallifrey milestone Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@negasora negasora

Labels
Edition: Ultimate Effort: Low Issue should take < 1 week Impact: Low Issue is a papercut or has a good, supported workaround Type: Enhancement Issue is a small enhancement to existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Gallifrey
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@fuzyll @negasora