Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review/redesign/refactor ScheduledExecutor #90

Open
sighphyre opened this issue Feb 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Review/redesign/refactor ScheduledExecutor #90

sighphyre opened this issue Feb 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
pinned Should not go stale

Comments

@sighphyre
Copy link
Member

Implementation of bootstrapping has lead to some subtle changes to the ScheduledExecutor class. There's some discussion around how this needs to work and what the code needs to look like. Ideally, we need to define the behaviour we'd like to see from this class before we change code.

This is especially important to decide so that we can finalise how async intialisation works (which we partially support at the moment) and will be important if we decide we need to implement the "block until ready" that some of the other SDKs support. Both of these would be surprising, breaking changes from a consumer perspective so deciding on how ScheduledExecutor needs to work is important

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 2, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Nov 2, 2022
@rarruda rarruda added pinned Should not go stale and removed stale labels Nov 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pinned Should not go stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants