Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question regarding the experiment results in paper ? #8

Open
WaNePr opened this issue Dec 17, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

question regarding the experiment results in paper ? #8

WaNePr opened this issue Dec 17, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@WaNePr
Copy link

WaNePr commented Dec 17, 2019

In WebQSP dataset, the proposed method outperforms all other methods;
However, S-MART gives a relatively higher recall (~10%) than the proposed method, Have you thought about why this is the case ?

@daniilsorokin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

good question! S-MART does extract much more entities and achieves higher recall at the expense of big drops in precision. It also often does information extraction rather than the strict entity linking, which also produced more noise but also more sort of relevant entities, which again boosts recall. For example, it gives Stan Lee for a Peter Parker mention.

You can take a look at some S-MART output in the original repo: https://github.com/scottyih/STAGG/blob/master/webquestions.examples.train.e2e.top10.filter.tsv

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants