-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create EDF test cases of Ranked Choice Voting #60
Comments
Added a wiki page about RCV: https://github.com/TrustTheVote-Project/NIST-1500-100-103-examples/wiki/ranked_choice |
Created a Versasim base for mocking up Hadron Party Primary featuring ranked-choice voting. |
I took a look at the wiki page, and everything I see there makes sense to me. For EDFs, the new For CVRs, everything in section 5.8.1 of the NIST-1500-103 specification also looks sensible. The client would generate a one One question about the NIST-1500-103 doc - I found two (here on GitHub and here on NIST's website). Which is correct? Can you link the correct one in your wiki? |
I'll post a PR when I have a draft of an actual EDF, so others can review it. As for the NIST-1500-103 specification document: unless we're told otherwise, we should use the published version: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1500-103. |
@mattbeattie it turns out the difference between the latest GitHub version and the officially published version is on the last page of each. The published version was created on March 31, 2020 (git: 8b3373ee). The one on the current GitHub version is 3 commits later on Apr. 21, 2020 (git: 6ad813ed), and has these changes:
So if you had relied on the GitHub version nothing major changed, though of course the published version is still the one to use. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: