You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Voting Instructions question: should "n-of-m" instructions read like this?
Vote for up to 4
Or this?
Vote for
Answer: "Vote for up to N" where N is VotesAllowed.
Data consistency question: do all "plurality" type elections require that VotesAllowed = 1?
Answer: Plurality is implicitly ... VotesAllowed == 1. That is also true for other VoteVariations as well, but not ones that we are supporting at present.
See comments below for details
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Plurality is implicitly (sorry) VotesAllowed == 1. That is also true for other VoteVariations as well, but not ones that we are supporting at present. For example, the top two voting method is vote for one, but the tabulation rule is that the top two vote getters "win". Rarely used.
For each Candidate Contest, the ballot displays instructions on how many candidates you can vote for, like this:
Retrieve this information from the EDF.
For example:
Voting Instructions question: should "n-of-m" instructions read like this?
Or this?
Answer: "Vote for up to N" where N is VotesAllowed.
Data consistency question: do all "plurality" type elections require that VotesAllowed = 1?
Answer: Plurality is implicitly ... VotesAllowed == 1. That is also true for other VoteVariations as well, but not ones that we are supporting at present.
See comments below for details
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: