Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can edit a Draft Election in a way that Election Settings does not appear. #127

Open
awoflaherty opened this issue Mar 25, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@awoflaherty
Copy link
Contributor

awoflaherty commented Mar 25, 2023

To reproduce:

  1. Create a new test and put in test mode.
  2. End Test Mode
  3. From Dashboard, Election appears under Draft and then click on Continue Editing. The Update Election page appears correctly.
  4. Rather than touch Next, use the Wizard feature beneath the Next button to select Election Settings.
  5. Election Settings appears with no values.
  6. Realized you have "f*ed up", so click away and try again using the Next button. Values are still missing in Election Settings screen.
  7. Enter new values in Election Settings screen, then click Next and all the data that was uploaded in Step 1 is gone.
  8. Tiptoe out of this draft back to dashboard. Appear from dashboard that EDF, ballots, etc is still intact, so put in test mode and use app to look at information.
  9. Realize that the changes you made in Election Settings on step 9 did not save.
  10. End Test Mode. Repeat steps 3 and 4. Instead of step 5, use the Next button NOT the feature below the Next button.
  11. Values from first test are there, so carefully edit, save and put into new Test mode.
  12. Test mode works as expected.
    In conclusion, I don't think the feature at the bottom of the page works consistently.
@trustthevote
Copy link
Member

I agree that there not a good situation in the back-and-forth between (a) the sequence of next and back (b) random access via the numbered step sequence.

However, it is not a blocker for acceptance testing.

I would, however, like this issue to get a good look-at by Raynu, and determine the best way to streamline it.

@amekelburg
Copy link
Contributor

Relates to #89

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants