-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DB/Quest: More blizz like behavior for quest "What We Don't Know..." #29839
Comments
Sometimes (try to remove aura with right click) the gossip doesn't works and maybe there's need one more condition to remove the aura when not on quest. |
@CraftedRO |
|
seems range related, if you are closer to the npc will work but if you are a bit away it will fail to apply the aura, idk if is smth we can do about this. |
@CraftedRO This flag was the only thing I could find that could maybe fix it, but it seems to not yet be implemented. Hopefully there is someone else around here that maybe knows more how to fix this. 😕 |
also not related to this but maybe we can hide prisoneer gossip and dialog when player don't have aura, atm we can talk and get credit even without aura |
@CraftedRO |
Meh I woud suggest to remove this line: (-- Move spell from "quest_template_addon" to script) so we can merge this, untill someone will implement missing cast_flags or some SMART_ACTION_ADD_AURA alternative idk. |
Try this script and see what you guys think. |
Description
When you accept the quest What We Don't Know... (9756) the spell Exarch's Enchantment (31609) is cast on the player. Currently this is done through an "SourceSpell" in "quest_template_addon" which makes it look like the player is casting the spell on him/her self, but on live servers Exarch Admetius (17658) is the one that cast the spell.
Included is allso a fix that gives Exarch Admetius an gossip menu option to recast the spell should it for some reason run out or disappear.
Video of quest being taken.
All info is from live Wrath Classic server.
SQL fix
UPDATE 1
UPDATE 2
Branch
3.3.5
TC rev. hash/commit
75cbafd
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: