-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please advice. #157
Comments
It's possible, I run mine like that. Only dump1090 on one side connected to the dongle, and on the other side dump1090 connecting to the remote dongle (net-only). Dongle side:
Connected to all providers side:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello all! I am building remote station, which will be placed at a good remote place with a wide open horizon, but the 4G connection data plan is limited. So looking at the traffic of my home station i thinking about a solution to that problem. I want to ask is it will be possible to run only [dump1090-fa] with Skyaware on the remote place and run another station at the home location with Thom-x [docker-fr24feed-piaware-dump1090] to reduce the traffic. Remote and home have static IP and all possible port forwardings. I am just don't know if the Thom-x docker image could be configured to suit my needs and save the traffic bandwidth of the remote station, please advice.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: