-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validating the model #20
Comments
You can get the training loss without any changes. You can use If you want to evaluate on the dev set during training, you can set If you want to add additional information to that, you can use additional |
The concept is simple but I am still not able to plot anything. In the training function we have these lines:
If I understand it right, for each epoch, the first one contains every result that we have generated, and the second and third ones the learning rate and loss. For this case I am going to plot this info only with one epoch, but it should still show something. As per the documentation, I understand that we only need to launch this line I get no error message in any point of the implementation (having activated the option There is a folder called |
There should be a subdirectory inside runs for every training run. So your command would look like To visualize the last run, you can use the line below. |
There is a directory called
I get a message saying that I have tried with different ports but no way. I have been researching on the internet and some people says that it's possible to achieve this using a tunnel, ngrok, here. Before trying it I would like to ask you if it makes sense, or if it should work straightforward from google colab. |
Supposedly wouldn't be needed... https://www.tensorflow.org/tensorboard/tensorboard_in_notebooks |
Great to see you got it to work. I didn't realize you were on Colab! |
Hi,
I would like to know if the model over-fits and also the optimum number of epochs, plotting accuracy and loss as it's shown here. It would be possible to do it using this repo without making too many changes (maybe using the evaluation results as validation)?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: