You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In part prompted by the start of work on #1748: it's time to think about a style guide, and an actual implementation of styles, for interactive Textual widgets in relation to being enabled/disabled and focused/unfocused. The main aims should be that a user of a Textual application can:
See at a glance which widgets are enabled
See at a glance which widgets are disabled
See at a glance which widgets that have their own "cursor" are focused and where the cursor is
See at a glance which widgets that have their own "cursor" are unfocused and where the cursor is
There should probably be an overlap here too. It would make sense, I think, for a Tree or a DataTable to have no focus, be disabled, but also have content and have a cursor highlighting something; done in a way that it's obvious that it's disabled and not just lacking focus.
Things to consider:
The styling should be as universal as possible
It should be possible to theme it (when themes become a thing)
It should work for both dark and light mode
It should always be easy for a developer to override it
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In part prompted by the start of work on #1748: it's time to think about a style guide, and an actual implementation of styles, for interactive Textual widgets in relation to being enabled/disabled and focused/unfocused. The main aims should be that a user of a Textual application can:
There should probably be an overlap here too. It would make sense, I think, for a
Tree
or aDataTable
to have no focus, be disabled, but also have content and have a cursor highlighting something; done in a way that it's obvious that it's disabled and not just lacking focus.Things to consider:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: