Rethinking the local library approach #201
NattyNarwhal
started this conversation in
Polls
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
So I'm assuming this is related to the bug I noted a couple of months back where local (SMB Volume) files wouldn't play after Submariner had been quit and relaunched. It would be a shame to ditch non-Subsonic, directly referenced files for a few reasons:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Since from the days before I developed Submariner, it's had features for managing a local library, in addition to music from a server. While this aggregates downloaded music from a server, you can also import music from the local filesystem, be it copied into the directory or linked to the original file. I'm not sure why it was like that, but it is how it was.
However, I've been thinking of getting rid of this. It complicates a lot of things with the interface and code that makes it harder to work on. Specifically:
Removing it would allow Submariner to focus on managing music from Subsonic servers, and allow removing a lot of code. If I do such a thing:
(As a lighter alternative, removing linked tracks might be another alternative that would keep things simpler.)
I however, want to hear from users before I do a bigger change like this. Such a change would probably entail a 4.0, and if I do go through with it, I might soft-deprecate the options (i.e. hiding behind a defaults database option) before totally removing it.
6 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions