Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Work out a concept for dict setting completions #157

Open
FichteFoll opened this issue Sep 26, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Work out a concept for dict setting completions #157

FichteFoll opened this issue Sep 26, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@FichteFoll
Copy link
Member

FichteFoll commented Sep 26, 2017

Currently, we just ignore dicts when offering value completions, because

  1. we don't know how to handle them in most situations, especially when they occur as secondary values inside a list,
  2. our architecture can't handle unhashable type (and we have special handling for lists)

Completions currently originate from either the default value, parsing comments and indirectly from list items of a default list value. Currently it seems only completing the default value it sensible.

Related: #156, 2fba8f5

@FichteFoll FichteFoll changed the title Work out a concept for dict completions Work out a concept for dict setting completions Nov 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant