You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recently updated node-red and actionflows on a new server with the same code. Actionflows of the same name do not flow to the next node of higher priority dependably, and instead just stops the flow at the first node of a singular name(.1) instead of flowing to name(.2) of a higher priority like it used to. This renders actionflows somewhat useless as they are unreliable in building a chain of actions.
In this scenario, EnqueueRecord.PFQ would fire, but the following one, EnqueueRecord.PFT does not fire and there are no errors, no warning, and nothing in the logs. It just doesn't execute the follow-on code. This is completely different from actionflows behavior that is documented, and I have personally observed for more than 5 years.
Node-Red v3.0.2
latest version of actionflows
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Recently updated node-red and actionflows on a new server with the same code. Actionflows of the same name do not flow to the next node of higher priority dependably, and instead just stops the flow at the first node of a singular name(.1) instead of flowing to name(.2) of a higher priority like it used to. This renders actionflows somewhat useless as they are unreliable in building a chain of actions.
In this scenario, EnqueueRecord.PFQ would fire, but the following one, EnqueueRecord.PFT does not fire and there are no errors, no warning, and nothing in the logs. It just doesn't execute the follow-on code. This is completely different from actionflows behavior that is documented, and I have personally observed for more than 5 years.
Node-Red v3.0.2
latest version of actionflows
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: