Setup_fastf1 + vignette

[pbulsink]

DRAFT Not to merge yet.

@SCasanova any suggestions for function enhancements or vignette improvements are appreciated.

Would a similar helper function for folks to easily update fastf1 to the current version be worthwhile?

As per #119

[SCasanova]

Hmm perhaps a more dedicated vignette towards advanced use-cases (the type of analysis you do with the package for example, if you're comfortable sharing that).

[pbulsink]

Hmm perhaps a more dedicated vignette towards advanced use-cases (the type of analysis you do with the package for example, if you're comfortable sharing that).

I think I can come up with a set of 'exploratory' analysis type things for some Ergast-derived data. That'd be a after-CRAN job I think. Is there anything extra for this setup_fastf1 vignette that you think should be added?

[SCasanova]

No, I think it's pretty thorough

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #126 (e8087e1) into master (c6fe2b1) will decrease coverage by 0.46%.
The diff coverage is 84.00%.

❗ Current head e8087e1 differs from pull request most recent head e979819. Consider uploading reports for the commit e979819 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #126      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.33%   91.87%   -0.46%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines         535      554      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits          494      509      +15     
- Misses         41       45       +4     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
R/load_race_session.R	90.32% <ø> (ø)
R/load_schedule.R	100.00% <ø> (ø)
R/load_session_laps.R	97.91% <ø> (ø)
R/utils.R	77.14% <80.95%> (+0.21%)	⬆️
R/load_driver_telemetry.R	88.23% <100.00%> (+0.23%)	⬆️

[pbulsink]

I think this can be merged now... That was tough to hammer out for all the platforms.

[pbulsink]

You likely need to mark a new release in GitHub - this is v1.2.0