-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
lifeofpi.html
7278 lines (6901 loc) · 546 KB
/
lifeofpi.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>life of pi</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css">
</head>
<body>
<div class="top-container">
<h6>Novel by</h6>
<h1>Yann Martel</h1>
</div>
<div class="container" >
<div id="myHeader" class="header">
<a href="index.html"><button>Home</button></a>
<div class="wrapper">
<input type="text" id="text-to-search" placeholder="Enter text to search...">
<button onclick="search()">Search</button>
</div>
</div>
<p id="paragraph">My suffering left me sad and gloomy.
Academic study and the steady, mindful practice of religion slowly brought me back to life. I
have kept up what some people would consider my strange religious practices. After one year of high
school, I attended the University of Toronto and took a double-major Bachelor’s degree. My majors
were religious studies and zoology. My fourth-year thesis for religious studies concerned certain
aspects of the cosmogony theory of Isaac Luria, the great sixteenth-century Kabbalist from Safed. My
zoology thesis was a functional analysis of the thyroid gland of the three-toed sloth. I chose the sloth
because its demeanour—calm, quiet and introspective—did something to soothe my shattered self.
There are two-toed sloths and there are three-toed sloths, the case being determined by the
forepaws of the animals, since all sloths have three claws on their hind paws. I had the great luck one
summer of studying the three-toed sloth in situ in the equatorial jungles of Brazil. It is a highly
intriguing creature. Its only real habit is indolence. It sleeps or rests on average twenty hours a day.
Our team tested the sleep habits of five wild three-toed sloths by placing on their heads, in the early
evening after they had fallen asleep, bright red plastic dishes filled with water. We found them still in
place late the next morning, the water of the dishes swarming with insects. The sloth is at its busiest at
sunset, using the word busy here in the most relaxed sense. It moves along the bough of a tree in its
characteristic upside-down position at the speed of roughly 400 metres an hour. On the ground, it
crawls to its next tree at the rate of 250 metres an hour, when motivated, which is 440 times slower
than a motivated cheetah. Unmotivated, it covers four to five metres in an hour.
The three-toed sloth is not well informed about the outside world. On a scale of 2 to 10, where 2
represents unusual dullness and 10 extreme acuity, Beebe (1926) gave the sloth’s senses of taste,
touch, sight and hearing a rating of 2, and its sense of smell a rating of 3. If you come upon a sleeping
three-toed sloth in the wild, two or three nudges should suffice to awaken it; it will then look sleepily
in every direction but yours. Why it should look about is uncertain since the sloth sees everything in a
Magoo-like blur. As for hearing, the sloth is not so much deaf as uninterested in sound. Beebe
reported that firing guns next to sleeping or feeding sloths elicited little reaction. And the sloth’s
slightly better sense of smell should not be overestimated. They are said to be able to sniff and avoid
decayed branches, but Bullock (1968) reported that sloths fall to the ground clinging to decayed
branches “often”.
How does it survive, you might ask.
Precisely by being so slow. Sleepiness and slothfulness keep it out of harm’s way, away from
the notice of jaguars, ocelots, harpy eagles and anacondas. A sloth’s hairs shelter an algae that is
brown during the dry season and green during the wet season, so the animal blends in with the
surrounding moss and foliage and looks like a nest of white ants or of squirrels, or like nothing at all
but part of a tree.
The three-toed sloth lives a peaceful, vegetarian life in perfect harmony with its environment. “A
good-natured smile is forever on its lips,” reported Tirler (1966). I have seen that smile with my own
eyes. I am not one given to projecting human traits and emotions onto animals, but many a time during
that month in Brazil, looking up at sloths in repose, I felt I was in the presence of upside-down yogis
deep in meditation or hermits deep in prayer, wise beings whose intense imaginative lives were
beyond the reach of my scientific probing.
Sometimes I got my majors mixed up. A number of my fellow religious-studies students—
muddled agnostics who didn’t know which way was up, who were in the thrall of reason, that fool’s
gold for the bright—reminded me of the three-toed sloth; and the three-toed sloth, such a beautiful
example of the miracle of life, reminded me of God.
I never had problems with my fellow scientists. Scientists are a friendly, atheistic, hard-
working, beer-drinking lot whose minds are preoccupied with sex, chess and baseball when they are
not preoccupied with science.
I was a very good student, if I may say so myself. I was tops at St. Michael’s College four years
in a row. I got every possible student award from the Department of Zoology. If I got none from the
Department of Religious Studies, it is simply because there are no student awards in this department
(the rewards of religious study are not in mortal hands, we all know that). I would have received the
Governor General’s Academic Medal, the University of Toronto’s highest undergraduate award, of
which no small number of illustrious Canadians have been recipients, were it not for a beef-eating
pink boy with a neck like a tree trunk and a temperament of unbearable good cheer.
I still smart a little at the slight. When you’ve suffered a great deal in life, each additional pain is
both unbearable and trifling. My life is like a memento mori painting from European art: there is
always a grinning skull at my side to remind me of the folly of human ambition. I mock this skull. I
look at it and I say, “You’ve got the wrong fellow. You may not believe in life, but I don’t believe in
death. Move on!” The skull snickers and moves ever closer, but that doesn’t surprise me. The reason
death sticks so closely to life isn’t biological necessity—it’s envy. Life is so beautiful that death has
fallen in love with it, a jealous, possessive love that grabs at what it can. But life leaps over oblivion
lightly, losing only a thing or two of no importance, and gloom is but the passing shadow of a cloud.
The pink boy also got the nod from the Rhodes Scholarship committee. I love him and I hope his time
at Oxford was a rich experience. If Lakshmi, goddess of wealth, one day favours me bountifully,
Oxford is fifth on the list of cities I would like to visit before I pass on, after Mecca, Varanasi,
Jerusalem and Paris.
I have nothing to say of my working life, only that a tie is a noose, and inverted though it is, it
will hang a man nonetheless if he’s not careful.
I love Canada. I miss the heat of India, the food, the house lizards on the walls, the musicals on
the silver screen, the cows wandering the streets, the crows cawing, even the talk of cricket matches,
but I love Canada. It is a great country much too cold for good sense, inhabited by compassionate,
intelligent people with bad hairdos. Anyway, I have nothing to go home to in Pondicherry.
Richard Parker has stayed with me. I’ve never forgotten him. Dare I say I miss him? I do. I miss
him. I still see him in my dreams. They are nightmares mostly, but nightmares tinged with love. Such
is the strangeness of the human heart. I still cannot understand how he could abandon me so
unceremoniously, without any sort of goodbye, without looking back even once. That pain is like an
axe that chops at my heart.
The doctors and nurses at the hospital in Mexico were incredibly kind to me. And the patients,
too. Victims of cancer or car accidents, once they heard my story, they hobbled and wheeled over to
see me, they and their families, though none of them spoke English and I spoke no Spanish. They
smiled at me, shook my hand, patted me on the head, left gifts of food and clothing on my bed. They
moved me to uncontrollable fits of laughing and crying.
Within a couple of days I could stand, even make two, three steps, despite nausea, dizziness and
general weakness. Blood tests revealed that I was anemic, and that my level of sodium was very high
and my potassium low. My body retained fluids and my legs swelled up tremendously. I looked as if I
had been grafted with a pair of elephant legs. My urine was a deep, dark yellow going on to brown.
After a week or so, I could walk just about normally and I could wear shoes if I didn’t lace them up.
My skin healed, though I still have scars on my shoulders and back.
The first time I turned a tap on, its noisy, wasteful, superabundant gush was such a shock that I
became incoherent and my legs collapsed beneath me and I fainted in the arms of a nurse.
The first time I went to an Indian restaurant in Canada I used my fingers. The waiter looked at
me critically and said, “Fresh off the boat, are you?” I blanched. My fingers, which a second before
had been taste buds savouring the food a little ahead of my mouth, became dirty under his gaze. They
froze like criminals caught in the act. I didn’t dare lick them. I wiped them guiltily on my napkin. He
had no idea how deeply those words wounded me. They were like nails being driven into my flesh. I
picked up the knife and fork. I had hardly ever used such instruments. My hands trembled. My sambar
lost its taste.
CHAPTER 2
He lives in Scarborough. He’s a small, slim man—no more than five foot five. Dark hair, dark
eyes. Hair greying at the temples. Can’t be older than forty. Pleasing cof ee-coloured complexion.
Mild fall weather, yet puts on a big winter parka with fur-lined hood for the walk to the diner.
Expressive face. Speaks quickly, hands flitting about. No small talk. He launches forth.
CHAPTER 3
I was named after a swimming pool. Quite peculiar considering my parents never took to water. One
of my father’s earliest business contacts was Francis Adirubasamy. He became a good friend of the
family. I called him Mamaji, mama being the Tamil word for uncle and ji being a suffix used in India
to indicate respect and affection. When he was a young man, long before I was born, Mamaji was a
champion competitive swimmer, the champion of all South India. He looked the part his whole life.
My brother Ravi once told me that when Mamaji was born he didn’t want to give up on breathing
water and so the doctor, to save his life, had to take him by the feet and swing him above his head
round and round.
“It did the trick!” said Ravi, wildly spinning his hand above his head. “He coughed out water
and started breathing air, but it forced all his flesh and blood to his upper body. That’s why his chest
is so thick and his legs are so skinny.”
I believed him. (Ravi was a merciless teaser. The first time he called Mamaji “Mr. Fish” to my
face I left a banana peel in his bed.) Even in his sixties, when he was a little stooped and a lifetime of
counter-obstetric gravity had begun to nudge his flesh downwards, Mamaji swam thirty lengths every
morning at the pool of the Aurobindo Ashram.
He tried to teach my parents to swim, but he never got them to go beyond wading up to their
knees at the beach and making ludicrous round motions with their arms, which, if they were practising
the breaststroke, made them look as if they were walking through a jungle, spreading the tall grass
ahead of them, or, if it was the front crawl, as if they were running down a hill and flailing their arms
so as not to fall. Ravi was just as unenthusiastic.
Mamaji had to wait until I came into the picture to find a willing disciple. The day I came of
swimming age, which, to Mother’s distress, Mamaji claimed was seven, he brought me down to the
beach, spread his arms seaward and said, “This is my gift to you.”
“And then he nearly drowned you,” claimed Mother.
I remained faithful to my aquatic guru. Under his watchful eye I lay on the beach and fluttered my
legs and scratched away at the sand with my hands, turning my head at every stroke to breathe. I must
have looked like a child throwing a peculiar, slow-motion tantrum. In the water, as he held me at the
surface, I tried my best to swim. It was much more difficult than on land. But Mamaji was patient and
encouraging.
When he felt that I had progressed sufficiently, we turned our backs on the laughing and the
shouting, the running and the splashing, the blue-green waves and the bubbly surf, and headed for the
proper rectangularity and the formal flatness (and the paying admission) of the ashram swimming
pool.
I went there with him three times a week throughout my childhood, a Monday, Wednesday,
Friday early morning ritual with the clockwork regularity of a good front-crawl stroke. I have vivid
memories of this dignified old man stripping down to nakedness next to me, his body slowly emerging
as he neatly disposed of each item of clothing, decency being salvaged at the very end by a slight
turning away and a magnificent pair of imported athletic bathing trunks. He stood straight and he was
ready. It had an epic simplicity. Swimming instruction, which in time became swimming practice,
was gruelling, but there was the deep pleasure of doing a stroke with increasing ease and speed, over
and over, till hypnosis practically, the water turning from molten lead to liquid light.
It was on my own, a guilty pleasure, that I returned to the sea, beckoned by the mighty waves that
crashed down and reached for me in humble tidal ripples, gentle lassos that caught their willing
Indian boy.
My gift to Mamaji one birthday, I must have been thirteen or so, was two full lengths of credible
butterfly. I finished so spent I could hardly wave to him.
Beyond the activity of swimming, there was the talk of it. It was the talk that Father loved. The
more vigorously he resisted actually swimming, the more he fancied it. Swim lore was his vacation
talk from the workaday talk of running a zoo. Water without a hippopotamus was so much more
manageable than water with one.
Mamaji studied in Paris for two years, thanks to the colonial administration. He had the time of
his life. This was in the early 1930s, when the French were still trying to make Pondicherry as Gallic
as the British were trying to make the rest of India Britannic. I don’t recall exactly what Mamaji
studied. Something commercial, I suppose. He was a great storyteller, but forget about his studies or
the Eiffel Tower or the Louvre or the cafés of the Champs-Elysées. All his stories had to do with
swimming pools and swimming competitions. For example, there was the Piscine Deligny, the city’s
oldest pool, dating back to 1796, an open-air barge moored to the Quai d’Orsay and the venue for the
swimming events of the 1900 Olympics. But none of the times were recognized by the International
Swimming Federation because the pool was six metres too long. The water in the pool came straight
from the Seine, unfiltered and unheated. “It was cold and dirty,” said Mamaji. “The water, having
crossed all of Paris, came in foul enough. Then people at the pool made it utterly disgusting.” In
conspiratorial whispers, with shocking details to back up his claim, he assured us that the French had
very low standards of personal hygiene. “Deligny was bad enough. Bain Royal, another latrine on the
Seine, was worse. At least at Deligny they scooped out the dead fish.” Nevertheless, an Olympic pool
is an Olympic pool, touched by immortal glory. Though it was a cesspool, Mamaji spoke of Deligny
with a fond smile.
One was better off at the Piscines Château-Landon, Rouvet or du boulevard de la Gare. They
were indoor pools with roofs, on land and open year-round. Their water was supplied by the
condensation from steam engines from nearby factories and so was cleaner and warmer. But these
pools were still a bit dingy and tended to be crowded. “There was so much gob and spit floating in
the water, I thought I was swimming through jellyfish,” chuckled Mamaji.
The Piscines Hébert, Ledru-Rollin and Butte-aux-Cailles were bright, modern, spacious pools
fed by artesian wells. They set the standard for excellence in municipal swimming pools. There was
the Piscine des Tourelles, of course, the city’s other great Olympic pool, inaugurated during the
second Paris games, of 1924. And there were still others, many of them.
But no swimming pool in Mamaji’s eyes matched the glory of the Piscine Molitor. It was the
crowning aquatic glory of Paris, indeed, of the entire civilized world.
“It was a pool the gods would have delighted to swim in. Molitor had the best competitive
swimming club in Paris. There were two pools, an indoor and an outdoor. Both were as big as small
oceans. The indoor pool always had two lanes reserved for swimmers who wanted to do lengths. The
water was so clean and clear you could have used it to make your morning coffee. Wooden changing
cabins, blue and white, surrounded the pool on two floors. You could look down and see everyone
and everything. The porters who marked your cabin door with chalk to show that it was occupied
were limping old men, friendly in an ill-tempered way. No amount of shouting and tomfoolery ever
ruffled them. The showers gushed hot, soothing water. There was a steam room and an exercise room.
The outside pool became a skating rink in winter. There was a bar, a cafeteria, a large sunning deck,
even two small beaches with real sand. Every bit of tile, brass and wood gleamed. It was—it was
...”
It was the only pool that made Mamaji fall silent, his memory making too many lengths to
mention.
Mamaji remembered, Father dreamed.
That is how I got my name when I entered this world, a last, welcome addition to my family,
three years after Ravi: Piscine Molitor Patel.
CHAPTER 4
Our good old nation was just seven years old as a republic when it became bigger by a small
territory. Pondicherry entered the Union of India on November 1, 1954. One civic achievement called
for another. A portion of the grounds of the Pondicherry Botanical Garden was made available rent-
free for an exciting business opportunity and—lo and behold—India had a brand new zoo, designed
and run according to the most modern, biologically sound principles.
It was a huge zoo, spread over numberless acres, big enough to require a train to explore it,
though it seemed to get smaller as I grew older, train included. Now it’s so small it fits in my head.
You must imagine a hot and humid place, bathed in sunshine and bright colours. The riot of flowers is
incessant. There are trees, shrubs and climbing plants in profusion—peepuls, gulmohurs, flames of
the forest, red silk cottons, jacarandas, mangoes, jackfruits and many others that would remain
unknown to you if they didn’t have neat labels at their feet. There are benches. On these benches you
see men sleeping, stretched out, or couples sitting, young couples, who steal glances at each other
shyly and whose hands flutter in the air, happening to touch. Suddenly, amidst the tall and slim trees
up ahead, you notice two giraffes quietly observing you. The sight is not the last of your surprises.
The next moment you are startled by a furious outburst coming from a great troupe of monkeys, only
outdone in volume by the shrill cries of strange birds. You come to a turnstile. You distractedly pay a
small sum of money. You move on. You see a low wall. What can you expect beyond a low wall?
Certainly not a shallow pit with two mighty Indian rhinoceros. But that is what you find. And when
you turn your head you see the elephant that was there all along, so big you didn’t notice it. And in the
pond you realize those are hippopotamuses floating in the water. The more you look, the more you
see. You are in Zootown!
Before moving to Pondicherry, Father ran a large hotel in Madras. An abiding interest in animals
led him to the zoo business. A natural transition, you might think, from hotelkeeping to zookeeping.
Not so. In many ways, running a zoo is a hotelkeeper’s worst nightmare. Consider: the guests never
leave their rooms; they expect not only lodging but full board; they receive a constant flow of visitors,
some of whom are noisy and unruly. One has to wait until they saunter to their balconies, so to speak,
before one can clean their rooms, and then one has to wait until they tire of the view and return to
their rooms before one can clean their balconies; and there is much cleaning to do, for the guests are
as unhygienic as alcoholics. Each guest is very particular about his or her diet, constantly complains
about the slowness of the service, and never, ever tips. To speak frankly, many are sexual deviants,
either terribly repressed and subject to explosions of frenzied lasciviousness or openly depraved, in
either case regularly affronting management with gross outrages of free sex and incest. Are these the
sorts of guests you would want to welcome to your inn? The Pondicherry Zoo was the source of some
pleasure and many headaches for Mr. Santosh Patel, founder, owner, director, head of a staff of fifty-
three, and my father.
To me, it was paradise on earth. I have nothing but the fondest memories of growing up in a zoo.
I lived the life of a prince. What maharaja’s son had such vast, luxuriant grounds to play about? What
palace had such a menagerie? My alarm clock during my childhood was a pride of lions. They were
no Swiss clocks, but the lions could be counted upon to roar their heads off between five-thirty and
six every morning. Breakfast was punctuated by the shrieks and cries of howler monkeys, hill mynahs
and Moluccan cockatoos. I left for school under the benevolent gaze not only of Mother but also of
bright-eyed otters and burly American bison and stretching and yawning orang-utans. I looked up as I
ran under some trees, otherwise peafowl might excrete on me. Better to go by the trees that sheltered
the large colonies of fruit bats; the only assault there at that early hour was the bats’ discordant
concerts of squeaking and chattering. On my way out I might stop by the terraria to look at some shiny
frogs glazed bright, bright green, or yellow and deep blue, or brown and pale green. Or it might be
birds that caught my attention: pink flamingoes or black swans or one-wattled cassowaries, or
something smaller, silver diamond doves, Cape glossy starlings, peach-faced lovebirds, Nanday
conures, orange-fronted parakeets. Not likely that the elephants, the seals, the big cats or the bears
would be up and doing, but the baboons, the macaques, the mangabeys, the gibbons, the deer, the
tapirs, the llamas, the giraffes, the mongooses were early risers. Every morning before I was out the
main gate I had one last impression that was both ordinary and unforgettable: a pyramid of turtles; the
iridescent snout of a mandrill; the stately silence of a giraffe; the obese, yellow open mouth of a
hippo; the beak-and-claw climbing of a macaw parrot up a wire fence; the greeting claps of a
shoebill’s bill; the senile, lecherous expression of a camel. And all these riches were had quickly, as
I hurried to school. It was after school that I discovered in a leisurely way what it’s like to have an
elephant search your clothes in the friendly hope of finding a hidden nut, or an orang-utan pick through
your hair for tick snacks, its wheeze of disappointment at what an empty pantry your head is. I wish I
could convey the perfection of a seal slipping into water or a spider monkey swinging from point to
point or a lion merely turning its head. But language founders in such seas. Better to picture it in your
head if you want to feel it.
In zoos, as in nature, the best times to visit are sunrise and sunset. That is when most animals
come to life. They stir and leave their shelter and tiptoe to the water’s edge. They show their
raiments. They sing their songs. They turn to each other and perform their rites. The reward for the
watching eye and the listening ear is great. I spent more hours than I can count a quiet witness to the
highly mannered, manifold expressions of life that grace our planet. It is something so bright, loud,
weird and delicate as to stupefy the senses.
I have heard nearly as much nonsense about zoos as I have about God and religion. Well-
meaning but misinformed people think animals in the wild are “happy” because they are “free”. These
people usually have a large, handsome predator in mind, a lion or a cheetah (the life of a gnu or of an
aardvark is rarely exalted). They imagine this wild animal roaming about the savannah on digestive
walks after eating a prey that accepted its lot piously, or going for callisthenic runs to stay slim after
overindulging. They imagine this animal overseeing its offspring proudly and tenderly, the whole
family watching the setting of the sun from the limbs of trees with sighs of pleasure. The life of the
wild animal is simple, noble and meaningful, they imagine. Then it is captured by wicked men and
thrown into tiny jails. Its “happiness” is dashed. It yearns mightily for “freedom” and does all it can
to escape. Being denied its “freedom” for too long, the animal becomes a shadow of itself, its spirit
broken. So some people imagine.
This is not the way it is.
Animals in the wild lead lives of compulsion and necessity within an unforgiving social
hierarchy in an environment where the supply of fear is high and the supply of food low and where
territory must constantly be defended and parasites forever endured. What is the meaning of freedom
in such a context? Animals in the wild are, in practice, free neither in space nor in time, nor in their
personal relations. In theory—that is, as a simple physical possibility—an animal could pick up and
go, flaunting all the social conventions and boundaries proper to its species. But such an event is less
likely to happen than for a member of our own species, say a shopkeeper with all the usual ties—to
family, to friends, to society—to drop everything and walk away from his life with only the spare
change in his pockets and the clothes on his frame. If a man, boldest and most intelligent of creatures,
won’t wander from place to place, a stranger to all, beholden to none, why would an animal, which is
by temperament far more conservative? For that is what animals are, conservative, one might even
say reactionary. The smallest changes can upset them. They want things to be just so, day after day,
month after month. Surprises are highly disagreeable to them. You see this in their spatial relations.
An animal inhabits its space, whether in a zoo or in the wild, in the same way chess pieces move
about a chessboard—significantly. There is no more happenstance, no more “freedom”, involved in
the whereabouts of a lizard or a bear or a deer than in the location of a knight on a chessboard. Both
speak of pattern and purpose. In the wild, animals stick to the same paths for the same pressing
reasons, season after season. In a zoo, if an animal is not in its normal place in its regular posture at
the usual hour, it means something. It may be the reflection of nothing more than a minor change in the
environment. A coiled hose left out by a keeper has made a menacing impression. A puddle has
formed that bothers the animal. A ladder is making a shadow. But it could mean something more. At
its worst, it could be that most dreaded thing to a zoo director: a symptom, a herald of trouble to
come, a reason to inspect the dung, to cross-examine the keeper, to summon the vet. All this because a
stork is not standing where it usually stands!
But let me pursue for a moment only one aspect of the question.
If you went to a home, kicked down the front door, chased the people who lived there out into
the street and said, “Go! You are free! Free as a bird! Go! Go!”—do you think they would shout and
dance for joy? They wouldn’t. Birds are not free. The people you’ve just evicted would sputter,
“With what right do you throw us out? This is our home. We own it. We have lived here for years.
We’re calling the police, you scoundrel.”
Don’t we say, “There’s no place like home”? That’s certainly what animals feel. Animals are
territorial. That is the key to their minds. Only a familiar territory will allow them to fulfill the two
relentless imperatives of the wild: the avoidance of enemies and the getting of food and water. A
biologically sound zoo enclosure—whether cage, pit, moated island, corral, terrarium, aviary or
aquarium—is just another territory, peculiar only in its size and in its proximity to human territory.
That it is so much smaller than what it would be in nature stands to reason. Territories in the wild are
large not as a matter of taste but of necessity. In a zoo, we do for animals what we have done for
ourselves with houses: we bring together in a small space what in the wild is spread out. Whereas
before for us the cave was here, the river over there, the hunting grounds a mile that way, the lookout
next to it, the berries somewhere else—all of them infested with lions, snakes, ants, leeches and
poison ivy—now the river flows through taps at hand’s reach and we can wash next to where we
sleep, we can eat where we have cooked, and we can surround the whole with a protective wall and
keep it clean and warm. A house is a compressed territory where our basic needs can be fulfilled
close by and safely. A sound zoo enclosure is the equivalent for an animal (with the noteworthy
absence of a fireplace or the like, present in every human habitation). Finding within it all the places
it needs—a lookout, a place for resting, for eating and drinking, for bathing, for grooming, etc.—and
finding that there is no need to go hunting, food appearing six days a week, an animal will take
possession of its zoo space in the same way it would lay claim to a new space in the wild, exploring
it and marking it out in the normal ways of its species, with sprays of urine perhaps. Once this
moving-in ritual is done and the animal has settled, it will not feel like a nervous tenant, and even less
like a prisoner, but rather like a landholder, and it will behave in the same way within its enclosure
as it would in its territory in the wild, including defending it tooth and nail should it be invaded. Such
an enclosure is subjectively neither better nor worse for an animal than its condition in the wild; so
long as it fulfills the animal’s needs, a territory, natural or constructed, simply is, without judgment, a
given, like the spots on a leopard. One might even argue that if an animal could choose with
intelligence, it would opt for living in a zoo, since the major difference between a zoo and the wild is
the absence of parasites and enemies and the abundance of food in the first, and their respective
abundance and scarcity in the second. Think about it yourself. Would you rather be put up at the Ritz
with free room service and unlimited access to a doctor or be homeless without a soul to care for
you? But animals are incapable of such discernment. Within the limits of their nature, they make do
with what they have.
A good zoo is a place of carefully worked-out coincidence: exactly where an animal says to us,
“Stay out!” with its urine or other secretion, we say to it, “Stay in!” with our barriers. Under such
conditions of diplomatic peace, all animals are content and we can relax and have a look at each
other.
In the literature can be found legions of examples of animals that could escape but did not, or did
and returned. There is the case of the chimpanzee whose cage door was left unlocked and had swung
open. Increasingly anxious, the chimp began to shriek and to slam the door shut repeatedly—with a
deafening clang each time—until the keeper, notified by a visitor, hurried over to remedy the
situation. A herd of roe-deer in a European zoo stepped out of their corral when the gate was left
open. Frightened by visitors, the deer bolted for the nearby forest, which had its own herd of wild
roe-deer and could support more. Nonetheless, the zoo roe-deer quickly returned to their corral. In
another zoo a worker was walking to his work site at an early hour, carrying planks of wood, when,
to his horror, a bear emerged from the morning mist, heading straight for him at a confident pace. The
man dropped the planks and ran for his life. The zoo staff immediately started searching for the
escaped bear. They found it back in its enclosure, having climbed down into its pit the way it had
climbed out, by way of a tree that had fallen over. It was thought that the noise of the planks of wood
falling to the ground had frightened it.
But I don’t insist. I don’t mean to defend zoos. Close them all down if you want (and let us hope
that what wildlife remains can survive in what is left of the natural world). I know zoos are no longer
in people’s good graces. Religion faces the same problem. Certain illusions about freedom plague
them both.
The Pondicherry Zoo doesn’t exist any more. Its pits are filled in, the cages torn down. I explore
it now in the only place left for it, my memory.
CHAPTER 5
My name isn’t the end of the story about my name. When your name is Bob no one asks you, “How do
you spell that?” Not so with Piscine Molitor Patel.
Some thought it was P. Singh and that I was a Sikh, and they wondered why I wasn’t wearing a
turban.
In my university days I visited Montreal once with some friends. It fell to me to order pizzas one
night. I couldn’t bear to have yet another French speaker guffawing at my name, so when the man on
the phone asked, “Can I ’ave your name?” I said, “I am who I am.” Half an hour later two pizzas
arrived for “Ian Hoolihan”.
It is true that those we meet can change us, sometimes so profoundly that we are not the same
afterwards, even unto our names. Witness Simon who is called Peter, Matthew also known as Levi,
Nathaniel who is also Bartholomew, Judas, not Iscariot, who took the name Thaddeus, Simeon who
went by Niger, Saul who became Paul.
My Roman soldier stood in the schoolyard one morning when I was twelve. I had just arrived.
He saw me and a flash of evil genius lit up his dull mind. He raised his arm, pointed at me and
shouted, “It’s Pissing Patel!”
In a second everyone was laughing. It fell away as we filed into the class. I walked in last,
wearing my crown of thorns.
The cruelty of children comes as news to no one. The words would waft across the yard to my
ears, unprovoked, uncalled for: “Where’s Pissing? I’ve got to go.” Or: “You’re facing the wall. Are
you Pissing?” Or something of the sort. I would freeze or, the contrary, pursue my activity, pretending
not to have heard. The sound would disappear, but the hurt would linger, like the smell of piss long
after it has evaporated.
Teachers started doing it too. It was the heat. As the day wore on, the geography lesson, which in
the morning had been as compact as an oasis, started to stretch out like the Thar Desert; the history
lesson, so alive when the day was young, became parched and dusty; the mathematics lesson, so
precise at first, became muddled. In their afternoon fatigue, as they wiped their foreheads and the
backs of their necks with their handkerchiefs, without meaning to offend or get a laugh, even teachers
forgot the fresh aquatic promise of my name and distorted it in a shameful way. By nearly
imperceptible modulations I could hear the change. It was as if their tongues were charioteers driving
wild horses. They could manage well enough the first syllable, the Pea, but eventually the heat was
too much and they lost control of their frothy-mouthed steeds and could no longer rein them in for the
climb to the second syllable, the seen. Instead they plunged hell-bent into sing, and next time round,
all was lost. My hand would be up to give an answer, and I would be acknowledged with a “Yes,
Pissing.” Often the teacher wouldn’t realize what he had just called me. He would look at me wearily
after a moment, wondering why I wasn’t coming out with the answer. And sometimes the class, as
beaten down by the heat as he was, wouldn’t react either. Not a snicker or a smile. But I always heard
the slur.
I spent my last year at St. Joseph’s School feeling like the persecuted prophet Muhammad in
Mecca, peace be upon him. But just as he planned his flight to Medina, the Hejira that would mark the
beginning of Muslim time, I planned my escape and the beginning of a new time for me.
After St. Joseph’s, I went to Petit Séminaire, the best private English-medium secondary school
in Pondicherry. Ravi was already there, and like all younger brothers, I would suffer from following
in the footsteps of a popular older sibling. He was the athlete of his generation at Petit Séminaire, a
fearsome bowler and a powerful batter, the captain of the town’s best cricket team, our very own
Kapil Dev. That I was a swimmer made no waves; it seems to be a law of human nature that those
who live by the sea are suspicious of swimmers, just as those who live in the mountains are
suspicious of mountain climbers. But following in someone’s shadow wasn’t my escape, though I
would have taken any name over “Pissing”, even “Ravi’s brother”. I had a better plan than that.
I put it to execution on the very first day of school, in the very first class. Around me were other
alumni of St. Joseph’s. The class started the way all new classes start, with the stating of names. We
called them out from our desks in the order in which we happened to be sitting.
“Ganapathy Kumar,” said Ganapathy Kumar.
“Vipin Nath,” said Vipin Nath.
“Shamshool Hudha,” said Shamshool Hudha.
“Peter Dharmaraj,” said Peter Dharmaraj.
Each name elicited a tick on a list and a brief mnemonic stare from the teacher. I was terribly
nervous.
“Ajith Giadson,” said Ajith Giadson, four desks away ...
“Sampath Saroja,” said Sampath Saroja, three away ...
“Stanley Kumar,” said Stanley Kumar, two away ...
“Sylvester Naveen,” said Sylvester Naveen, right in front of me.
It was my turn. Time to put down Satan. Medina, here I come.
I got up from my desk and hurried to the blackboard. Before the teacher could say a word, I
picked up a piece of chalk and said as I wrote:
My name is
Piscine Molitor Patel,
known to all as
—I double underlined the first two letters of my given name—
Pi Patel
For good measure I added
π= 3.14
and I drew a large circle, which I then sliced in two with a diameter, to evoke that basic lesson of
geometry.
There was silence. The teacher was staring at the board. I was holding my breath. Then he said,
“Very well, Pi. Sit down. Next time you will ask permission before leaving your desk.”
“Yes, sir.”
He ticked my name off. And looked at the next boy.
“Mansoor Ahamad,” said Mansoor Ahamad.
I was saved.
“Gautham Selvaraj,” said Gautham Selvaraj.
I could breathe.
“Arun Annaji,” said Arun Annaji.
A new beginning.
I repeated the stunt with every teacher. Repetition is important in the training not only of animals
but also of humans. Between one commonly named boy and the next, I rushed forward and
emblazoned, sometimes with a terrible screech, the details of my rebirth. It got to be that after a few
times the boys sang along with me, a crescendo that climaxed, after a quick intake of air while I
underlined the proper note, with such a rousing rendition of my new name that it would have been the
delight of any choirmaster. A few boys followed up with a whispered, urgent “Three! Point! One!
Four!” as I wrote as fast as I could, and I ended the concert by slicing the circle with such vigour that
bits of chalk went flying.
When I put my hand up that day, which I did every chance I had, teachers granted me the right to
speak with a single syllable that was music to my ears. Students followed suit. Even the St. Joseph’s
devils. In fact, the name caught on. Truly we are a nation of aspiring engineers: shortly after, there
was a boy named Omprakash who was calling himself Omega, and another who was passing himself
off as Upsilon, and for a while there was a Gamma, a Lambda and a Delta. But I was the first and the
most enduring of the Greeks at Petit Séminaire. Even my brother, the captain of the cricket team, that
local god, approved. He took me aside the next week.
“What’s this I hear about a nickname you have?” he said.
I kept silent. Because whatever mocking was to come, it was to come. There was no avoiding it.
“I didn’t realize you liked the colour yellow so much.”
The colour yellow? I looked around. No one must hear what he was about to say, especially not
one of his lackeys. “Ravi, what do you mean?” I whispered.
“It’s all right with me, brother. Anything’s better than ‘Pissing’. Even ‘Lemon Pie’.”
As he sauntered away he smiled and said, “You look a bit red in the face.”
But he held his peace.
And so, in that Greek letter that looks like a shack with a corrugated tin roof, in that elusive,
irrational number with which scientists try to understand the universe, I found refuge.
CHAPTER 6
He’s an excellent cook. His overheated house is always smelling of something delicious. His spice
rack looks like an apothecary’s shop. When he opens his refrigerator or his cupboards, there are
many brand names I don’t recognize; in fact, I can’t even tell what language they’re in. We are in
India. But he handles Western dishes equally well. He makes me the most zesty yet subtle macaroni
and cheese I’ve ever had. And his vegetarian tacos would be the envy of all Mexico.
I notice something else: his cupboards are jam-packed. Behind every door, on every shelf,
stand mountains of neatly stacked cans and packages. A reserve of food to last the siege of
Leningrad.
CHAPTER 7
It was my luck to have a few good teachers in my youth, men and women who came into my dark head
and lit a match. One of these was Mr. Satish Kumar, my biology teacher at Petit Séminaire and an
active Communist who was always hoping Tamil Nadu would stop electing movie stars and go the
way of Kerala. He had a most peculiar appearance. The top of his head was bald and pointy, yet he
had the most impressive jowls I have ever seen, and his narrow shoulders gave way to a massive
stomach that looked like the base of a mountain, except that the mountain stood in thin air, for it
stopped abruptly and disappeared horizontally into his pants. It’s a mystery to me how his stick-like
legs supported the weight above them, but they did, though they moved in surprising ways at times, as
if his knees could bend in any direction. His construction was geometric: he looked like two
triangles, a small one and a larger one, balanced on two parallel lines. But organic, quite warty
actually, and with sprigs of black hair sticking out of his ears. And friendly. His smile seemed to take
up the whole base of his triangular head.
Mr. Kumar was the first avowed atheist I ever met. I discovered this not in the classroom but at
the zoo. He was a regular visitor who read the labels and descriptive notices in their entirety and
approved of every animal he saw. Each to him was a triumph of logic and mechanics, and nature as a
whole was an exceptionally fine illustration of science. To his ears, when an animal felt the urge to
mate, it said “Gregor Mendel”, recalling the father of genetics, and when it was time to show its
mettle, “Charles Darwin”, the father of natural selection, and what we took to be bleating, grunting,
hissing, snorting, roaring, growling, howling, chirping and screeching were but the thick accents of
foreigners. When Mr. Kumar visited the zoo, it was to take the pulse of the universe, and his
stethoscopic mind always confirmed to him that everything was in order, that everything was order.
He left the zoo feeling scientifically refreshed.
The first time I saw his triangular form teetering and tottering about the zoo, I was shy to
approach him. As much as I liked him as a teacher, he was a figure of authority, and I, a subject. I was
a little afraid of him. I observed him at a distance. He had just come to the rhinoceros pit. The two
Indian rhinos were great attractions at the zoo because of the goats. Rhinos are social animals, and
when we got Peak, a young wild male, he was showing signs of suffering from isolation and he was
eating less and less. As a stopgap measure, while he searched for a female, Father thought of seeing if
Peak couldn’t be accustomed to living with goats. If it worked, it would save a valuable animal. If it
didn’t, it would only cost a few goats. It worked marvellously. Peak and the herd of goats became
inseparable, even when Summit arrived. Now, when the rhinos bathed, the goats stood around the
muddy pool, and when the goats ate in their corner, Peak and Summit stood next to them like guards.
The living arrangement was very popular with the public.
Mr. Kumar looked up and saw me. He smiled and, one hand holding onto the railing, the other
waving, signalled me to come over.
“Hello, Pi,” he said.
“Hello, sir. It’s good of you to come to the zoo.”
“I come here all the time. One might say it’s my temple. This is interesting ...” He was
indicating the pit. “If we had politicians like these goats and rhinos we’d have fewer problems in our
country. Unfortunately we have a prime minister who has the armour plating of a rhinoceros without
any of its good sense.”
I didn’t know much about politics. Father and Mother complained regularly about Mrs. Gandhi,
but it meant little to me. She lived far away in the north, not at the zoo and not in Pondicherry. But I
felt I had to say something.
“Religion will save us,” I said. Since when I could remember, religion had been very close to
my heart.
“Religion?” Mr. Kumar grinned broadly. “I don’t believe in religion. Religion is darkness.”
Darkness? I was puzzled. I thought, Darkness is the last thing that religion is. Religion is light.
Was he testing me? Was he saying, “Religion is darkness,” the way he sometimes said in class things
like “Mammals lay eggs,” to see if someone would correct him? (“Only platypuses, sir.”)
“There are no grounds for going beyond a scientific explanation of reality and no sound reason
for believing anything but our sense experience. A clear intellect, close attention to detail and a little
scientific knowledge will expose religion as superstitious bosh. God does not exist.”
Did he say that? Or am I remembering the lines of later atheists? At any rate, it was something of
the sort. I had never heard such words.
“Why tolerate darkness? Everything is here and clear, if only we look carefully.”
He was pointing at Peak. Now though I had great admiration for Peak, I had never thought of a
rhinoceros as a light bulb.
He spoke again. “Some people say God died during the Partition in 1947. He may have died in
1971 during the war. Or he may have died yesterday here in Pondicherry in an orphanage. That’s
what some people say, Pi. When I was your age, I lived in bed, racked with polio. I asked myself
every day, ‘Where is God? Where is God? Where is God?’ God never came. It wasn’t God who
saved me—it was medicine. Reason is my prophet and it tells me that as a watch stops, so we die.
It’s the end. If the watch doesn’t work properly, it must be fixed here and now by us. One day we will
take hold of the means of production and there will be justice on earth.”
This was all a bit much for me. The tone was right—loving and brave—but the details seemed
bleak. I said nothing. It wasn’t for fear of angering Mr. Kumar. I was more afraid that in a few words
thrown out he might destroy something that I loved. What if his words had the effect of polio on me?
What a terrible disease that must be if it could kill God in a man.
He walked off, pitching and rolling in the wild sea that was the steady ground. “Don’t forget the
test on Tuesday. Study hard, 3.14!”
“Yes, Mr. Kumar.”
He became my favourite teacher at Petit Séminaire and the reason I studied zoology at the
University of Toronto. I felt a kinship with him. It was my first clue that atheists are my brothers and
sisters of a different faith, and every word they speak speaks of faith. Like me, they go as far as the
legs of reason will carry them—and then they leap.
I’ll be honest about it. It is not atheists who get stuck in my craw, but agnostics. Doubt is useful
for a while. We must all pass through the garden of Gethsemane. If Christ played with doubt, so must
we. If Christ spent an anguished night in prayer, if He burst out from the Cross, “My God, my God,
why have you forsaken me?” then surely we are also permitted doubt. But we must move on. To
choose doubt as a philosophy of life is akin to choosing immobility as a means of transportation.
CHAPTER 8
We commonly say in the trade that the most dangerous animal in a zoo is Man. In a general way we
mean how our species’ excessive predatoriness has made the entire planet our prey. More
specifically, we have in mind the people who feed fishhooks to the otters, razors to the bears, apples
with small nails in them to the elephants and hardware variations on the theme: ballpoint pens, paper
clips, safety pins, rubber bands, combs, coffee spoons, horseshoes, pieces of broken glass, rings,
brooches and other jewellery (and not just cheap plastic bangles: gold wedding bands, too), drinking
straws, plastic cutlery, ping-pong balls, tennis balls and so on. The obituary of zoo animals that have
died from being fed foreign bodies would include gorillas, bison, storks, rheas, ostriches, seals, sea
lions, big cats, bears, camels, elephants, monkeys, and most every variety of deer, ruminant and
songbird. Among zookeepers, Goliath’s death is famous; he was a bull elephant seal, a great big
venerable beast of two tons, star of his European zoo, loved by all visitors. He died of internal
bleeding after someone fed him a broken beer bottle.
The cruelty is often more active and direct. The literature contains reports on the many torments
inflicted upon zoo animals: a shoebill dying of shock after having its beak smashed with a hammer; a
moose stag losing its beard, along with a strip of flesh the size of an index finger, to a visitor’s knife
(this same moose was poisoned six months later); a monkey’s arm broken after reaching out for
proffered nuts; a deer’s antlers attacked with a hacksaw; a zebra stabbed with a sword; and other
assaults on other animals, with walking sticks, umbrellas, hairpins, knitting needles, scissors and
whatnot, often with an aim to taking an eye out or to injuring sexual parts. Animals are also poisoned.
And there are indecencies even more bizarre: onanists breaking a sweat on monkeys, ponies, birds; a
religious freak who cut a snake’s head off; a deranged man who took to urinating in an elk’s mouth.
At Pondicherry we were relatively fortunate. We were spared the sadists who plied European
and American zoos. Nonetheless, our golden agouti vanished, stolen by someone who ate it, Father
suspected. Various birds—pheasants, peacocks, macaws—lost feathers to people greedy for their
beauty. We caught a man with a knife climbing into the pen for mouse deer; he said he was going to
punish evil Ravana (who in the Ramayana took the form of a deer when he kidnapped Sita, Rama’s
consort). Another man was nabbed in the process of stealing a cobra. He was a snake charmer whose
own snake had died. Both were saved: the cobra from a life of servitude and bad music, and the man
from a possible death bite. We had to deal on occasion with stone throwers, who found the animals
too placid and wanted a reaction. And we had the lady whose sari was caught by a lion. She spun like
a yo-yo, choosing mortal embarrassment over mortal end. The thing was, it wasn’t even an accident.
She had leaned over, thrust her hand in the cage and waved the end of her sari in the lion’s face, with
what intent we never figured out. She was not injured; there were many fascinated men who came to
her assistance. Her flustered explanation to Father was, “Whoever heard of a lion eating a cotton
sari? I thought lions were carnivores.” Our worst troublemakers were the visitors who gave food to
the animals. Despite our vigilance, Dr. Atal, the zoo veterinarian, could tell by the number of animals
with digestive disturbances which had been the busy days at the zoo. He called “tidbit-itis” the cases
of enteritis or gastritis due to too many carbohydrates, especially sugar. Sometimes we wished
people had stuck to sweets. People have a notion that animals can eat anything without the least
consequence to their health. Not so. One of our sloth bears became seriously ill with severe
hemorrhagic enteritis after being given fish that had gone putrid by a man who was convinced he was
doing a good deed.
Just beyond the ticket booth Father had had painted on a wall in bright red letters the question:
DO YOU KNOW WHICH IS THE MOST DANGEROUS ANIMAL IN THE ZOO? An arrow
pointed to a small curtain. There were so many eager, curious hands that pulled at the curtain that we
had to replace it regularly. Behind it was a mirror.
But I learned at my expense that Father believed there was another animal even more dangerous
than us, and one that was extremely common, too, found on every continent, in every habitat: the
redoubtable species Animalus anthropomorphicus, the animal as seen through human eyes. We’ve all
met one, perhaps even owned one. It is an animal that is “cute”, “friendly”, “loving”, “devoted”,
“merry”, “understanding”. These animals lie in ambush in every toy store and children’s zoo.
Countless stories are told of them. They are the pendants of those “vicious”, “bloodthirsty”,
“depraved” animals that inflame the ire of the maniacs I have just mentioned, who vent their spite on
them with walking sticks and umbrellas. In both cases we look at an animal and see a mirror. The
obsession with putting ourselves at the centre of everything is the bane not only of theologians but
also of zoologists.
I learned the lesson that an animal is an animal, essentially and practically removed from us,
twice: once with Father and once with Richard Parker.
It was on a Sunday morning. I was quietly playing on my own. Father called out.
“Children, come here.”
Something was wrong. His tone of voice set off a small alarm bell in my head. I quickly
reviewed my conscience. It was clear. Ravi must be in trouble again. I wondered what he had done
this time. I walked into the living room. Mother was there. That was unusual. The disciplining of
children, like the tending of animals, was generally left to Father. Ravi walked in last, guilt written
all over his criminal face.
“Ravi, Piscine, I have a very important lesson for you today.”
“Oh really, is this necessary?” interrupted Mother. Her face was flushed.
I swallowed. If Mother, normally so unruffled, so calm, was worried, even upset, it meant we
were in serious trouble. I exchanged glances with Ravi.
“Yes, it is,” said Father, annoyed. “It may very well save their lives.”
Save our lives! It was no longer a small alarm bell that was ringing in my head—they were big
bells now, like the ones we heard from Sacred Heart of Jesus Church, not far from the zoo.
“But Piscine? He’s only eight,” Mother insisted.
“He’s the one who worries me the most.”
“I’m innocent!” I burst out. “It’s Ravi’s fault, whatever it is. He did it!”
“What?” said Ravi. “I haven’t done anything wrong.” He gave me the evil eye.
“Shush!” said Father, raising his hand. He was looking at Mother. “Gita, you’ve seen Piscine.
He’s at that age when boys run around and poke their noses everywhere.”
Me? A run-arounder? An everywhere-nose-poker? Not so, not so! Defend me, Mother, defend
me, I implored in my heart. But she only sighed and nodded, a signal that the terrible business could
proceed.
“Come with me,” said Father.
We set out like prisoners off to their execution.
We left the house, went through the gate, entered the zoo. It was early and the zoo hadn’t opened
yet to the public. Animal keepers and groundskeepers were going about their work. I noticed Sitaram,
who oversaw the orang-utans, my favourite keeper. He paused to watch us go by. We passed birds,
bears, apes, monkeys, ungulates, the terrarium house, the rhinos, the elephants, the giraffes.
We came to the big cats, our tigers, lions and leopards. Babu, their keeper, was waiting for us.
We went round and down the path, and he unlocked the door to the cat house, which was at the centre
of a moated island. We entered. It was a vast and dim cement cavern, circular in shape, warm and
humid, and smelling of cat urine. All around were great big cages divided up by thick, green, iron
bars. A yellowish light filtered down from the skylights. Through the cage exits we could see the
vegetation of the surrounding island, flooded with sunlight. The cages were empty—save one:
Mahisha, our Bengal tiger patriarch, a lanky, hulking beast of 550 pounds, had been detained. As soon
as we stepped in, he loped up to the bars of his cage and set off a full-throated snarl, ears flat against
his skull and round eyes fixed on Babu. The sound was so loud and fierce it seemed to shake the
whole cat house. My knees started quaking. I got close to Mother. She was trembling, too. Even
Father seemed to pause and steady himself. Only Babu was indifferent to the outburst and to the
searing stare that bored into him like a drill. He had a tested trust in iron bars. Mahisha started pacing
to and fro against the limits of his cage.
Father turned to us. “What animal is this?” he bellowed above Mahisha’s snarling.
“It’s a tiger,” Ravi and I answered in unison, obediently pointing out the blindingly obvious.
“Are tigers dangerous?”
“Yes, Father, tigers are dangerous.”
“Tigers are very dangerous,” Father shouted. “I want you to understand that you are never—
under any circumstances—to touch a tiger, to pet a tiger, to put your hands through the bars of a cage,
even to get close to a cage. Is that clear? Ravi?”
Ravi nodded vigorously.
“Piscine?”
I nodded even more vigorously.
He kept his eyes on me.
I nodded so hard I’m surprised my neck didn’t snap and my head fall to the floor.
I would like to say in my own defence that though I may have anthropomorphized the animals till
they spoke fluent English, the pheasants complaining in uppity British accents of their tea being cold
and the baboons planning their bank robbery getaway in the flat, menacing tones of American
gangsters, the fancy was always conscious. I quite deliberately dressed wild animals in tame
costumes of my imagination. But I never deluded myself as to the real nature of my playmates. My
poking nose had more sense than that. I don’t know where Father got the idea that his youngest son
was itching to step into a cage with a ferocious carnivore. But wherever the strange worry came from
—and Father was a worrier—he was clearly determined to rid himself of it that very morning.
“I’m going to show you how dangerous tigers are,” he continued. “I want you to remember this
lesson for the rest of your lives.”
He turned to Babu and nodded. Babu left. Mahisha’s eyes followed him and did not move from
the door he disappeared through. He returned a few seconds later carrying a goat with its legs tied.
Mother gripped me from behind. Mahisha’s snarl turned into a growl deep in the throat.
Babu unlocked, opened, entered, closed and locked a cage next to the tiger’s cage. Bars and a
trapdoor separated the two. Immediately Mahisha was up against the dividing bars, pawing them. To
his growling he now added explosive, arrested woofs. Babu placed the goat on the floor; its flanks
were heaving violently, its tongue hung from its mouth, and its eyes were spinning orbs. He untied its
legs. The goat got to its feet. Babu exited the cage in the same careful way he had entered it. The cage
had two floors, one level with us, the other at the back, higher by about three feet, that led outside to
the island. The goat scrambled to this second level. Mahisha, now unconcerned with Babu, paralleled
the move in his cage in a fluid, effortless motion. He crouched and lay still, his slowly moving tail the
only sign of tension.
Babu stepped up to the trapdoor between the cages and started pulling it open. In anticipation of
satisfaction, Mahisha fell silent. I heard two things at that moment: Father saying “Never forget this
lesson” as he looked on grimly; and the bleating of the goat. It must have been bleating all along, only
we couldn’t hear it before.
I could feel Mother’s hand pressed against my pounding heart.
The trapdoor resisted with sharp cries. Mahisha was beside himself—he looked as if he were
about to burst through the bars. He seemed to hesitate between staying where he was, at the place
where his prey was closest but most certainly out of reach, and moving to the ground level, further
away but where the trapdoor was located. He raised himself and started snarling again.
The goat started to jump. It jumped to amazing heights. I had no idea a goat could jump so high.
But the back of the cage was a high and smooth cement wall.
With sudden ease the trapdoor slid open. Silence fell again, except for bleating and the click-
click of the goat’s hooves against the floor.
A streak of black and orange flowed from one cage to the next.
Normally the big cats were not given food one day a week, to simulate conditions in the wild.
We found out later that Father had ordered that Mahisha not be fed for three days.
I don’t know if I saw blood before turning into Mother’s arms or if I daubed it on later, in my
memory, with a big brush. But I heard. It was enough to scare the living vegetarian daylights out of
me. Mother bundled us out. We were in hysterics. She was incensed.
“How could you, Santosh? They’re children! They’ll be scarred for the rest of their lives.”
Her voice was hot and tremulous. I could see she had tears in her eyes. I felt better.
“Gita, my bird, it’s for their sake. What if Piscine had stuck his hand through the bars of the cage
one day to touch the pretty orange fur? Better a goat than him, no?”
His voice was soft, nearly a whisper. He looked contrite. He never called her “my bird” in front
of us.
We were huddled around her. He joined us. But the lesson was not over, though it was gentler
after that.
Father led us to the lions and leopards.
“Once there was a madman in Australia who was a black belt in karate. He wanted to prove
himself against the lions. He lost. Badly. The keepers found only half his body in the morning.”
“Yes, Father.”
The Himalayan bears and the sloth bears.
“One strike of the claws from these cuddly creatures and your innards will be scooped out and
splattered all over the ground.”
“Yes, Father.”
The hippos.
“With those soft, flabby mouths of theirs they’ll crush your body to a bloody pulp. On land they
can outrun you.”
“Yes, Father.”
The hyenas.
“The strongest jaws in nature. Don’t think that they’re cowardly or that they only eat carrion.
They’re not and they don’t! They’ll start eating you while you’re still alive.”
“Yes, Father.”
The orang-utans.
“As strong as ten men. They’ll break your bones as if they were twigs. I know some of them
were once pets and you played with them when they were small. But now they’re grown-up and wild
and unpredictable.”
“Yes, Father.”
The ostrich.
“Looks flustered and silly, doesn’t it? Listen up: it’s one of the most dangerous animals in a zoo.
Just one kick and your back is broken or your torso is crushed.”
“Yes, Father.”
The spotted deer.
“So pretty, aren’t they? If the male feels he has to, he’ll charge you and those short little antlers
will pierce you like daggers.”
“Yes, Father.”
The Arabian camel.
“One slobbering bite and you’ve lost a chunk of flesh.”
“Yes, Father.”
The black swans.
“With their beaks they’ll crack your skull. With their wings they’ll break your arms.”
“Yes, Father.”
The smaller birds.
“They’ll cut through your fingers with their beaks as if they were butter.”
“Yes, Father.”
The elephants.
“The most dangerous animal of all. More keepers and visitors are killed by elephants than by
any other animal in a zoo. A young elephant will most likely dismember you and trample your body
parts flat. That’s what happened to one poor lost soul in a European zoo who got into the elephant
house through a window. An older, more patient animal will squeeze you against a wall or sit on you.
Sounds funny—but think about it!”
“Yes, Father.”
“There are animals we haven’t stopped by. Don’t think they’re harmless. Life will defend itself
no matter how small it is. Every animal is ferocious and dangerous. It may not kill you, but it will
certainly injure you. It will scratch you and bite you, and you can look forward to a swollen, pus-
filled infection, a high fever and a ten-day stay in the hospital.”
“Yes, Father.”
We came to the guinea pigs, the only other animals besides Mahisha to have been starved at
Father’s orders, having been denied their previous evening’s meal. Father unlocked the cage. He
brought out a bag of feed from his pocket and emptied it on the floor.
“You see these guinea pigs?”
“Yes, Father.”
The creatures were trembling with weakness as they frantically nibbled their kernels of corn.
“Well ...” He leaned down and scooped one up. “They’re not dangerous.” The other guinea pigs
scattered instantly.
Father laughed. He handed me the squealing guinea pig. He meant to end on a light note.
The guinea pig rested in my arms tensely. It was a young one. I went to the cage and carefully
lowered it to the floor. It rushed to its mother’s side. The only reason these guinea pigs weren’t
dangerous—didn’t draw blood with their teeth and claws—was that they were practically
domesticated. Otherwise, to grab a wild guinea pig with your bare hands would be like taking hold of
a knife by the blade.
The lesson was over. Ravi and I sulked and gave Father the cold shoulder for a week. Mother
ignored him too. When I went by the rhinoceros pit I fancied the rhinos’ heads were hung low with
sadness over the loss of one of their dear companions.
But what can you do when you love your father? Life goes on and you don’t touch tigers. Except
that now, for having accused Ravi of an unspecified crime he hadn’t committed, I was as good as
dead. In years subsequent, when he was in the mood to terrorize me, he would whisper to me, “Just
wait till we’re alone. You’re the next goat!”
CHAPTER 9
Getting animals used to the presence of humans is at the heart of the art and science of zookeeping.
The key aim is to diminish an animal’s flight distance, which is the minimum distance at which an
animal wants to keep a perceived enemy. A flamingo in the wild won’t mind you if you stay more than
three hundred yards away. Cross that limit and it becomes tense. Get even closer and you trigger a
flight reaction from which the bird will not cease until the three-hundred-yard limit is set again, or
until heart and lungs fail. Different animals have different flight distances and they gauge them in
different ways. Cats look, deer listen, bears smell. Giraffes will allow you to come to within thirty
yards of them if you are in a motor car, but will run if you are 150 yards away on foot. Fiddler crabs
scurry when you’re ten yards away; howler monkeys stir in their branches when you’re at twenty;
African buffaloes react at seventy-five.
Our tools for diminishing flight distance are the knowledge we have of an animal, the food and
shelter we provide, the protection we afford. When it works, the result is an emotionally stable,
stress-free wild animal that not only stays put, but is healthy, lives a very long time, eats without fuss,
behaves and socializes in natural ways and—the best sign—reproduces. I won’t say that our zoo
compared to the zoos of San Diego or Toronto or Berlin or Singapore, but you can’t keep a good
zookeeper down. Father was a natural. He made up for a lack of formal training with an intuitive gift
and a keen eye. He had a knack for looking at an animal and guessing what was on its mind. He was
attentive to his charges, and they, in return, multiplied, some to excess.
CHAPTER 10
Yet there will always be animals that seek to escape from zoos. Animals that are kept in unsuitable
enclosures are the most obvious example. Every animal has particular habitat needs that must be met.
If its enclosure is too sunny or too wet or too empty, if its perch is too high or too exposed, if the
ground is too sandy, if there are too few branches to make a nest, if the food trough is too low, if there
is not enough mud to wallow in—and so many other ifs—then the animal will not be at peace. It is not
so much a question of constructing an imitation of conditions in the wild as of getting to the essence of
these conditions. Everything in an enclosure must be just right—in other words, within the limits of
the animal’s capacity to adapt. A plague upon bad zoos with bad enclosures! They bring all zoos into
disrepute.
Wild animals that are captured when they are fully mature are another example of escape-prone
animals; often they are too set in their ways to reconstruct their subjective worlds and adapt to a new
environment.
But even animals that were bred in zoos and have never known the wild, that are perfectly
adapted to their enclosures and feel no tension in the presence of humans, will have moments of
excitement that push them to seek to escape. All living things contain a measure of madness that
moves them in strange, sometimes inexplicable ways. This madness can be saving; it is part and
parcel of the ability to adapt. Without it, no species would survive.
Whatever the reason for wanting to escape, sane or insane, zoo detractors should realize that
animals don’t escape to somewhere but from something. Something within their territory has
frightened them—the intrusion of an enemy, the assault of a dominant animal, a startling noise—and
set off a flight reaction. The animal flees, or tries to. I was surprised to read at the Toronto Zoo—a
very fine zoo, I might add—that leopards can jump eighteen feet straight up. Our leopard enclosure in
Pondicherry had a wall sixteen feet high at the back; I surmise that Rosie and Copycat never jumped
out not because of constitutional weakness but simply because they had no reason to. Animals that
escape go from the known into the unknown—and if there is one thing an animal hates above all else,
it is the unknown. Escaping animals usually hide in the very first place they find that gives them a
sense of security, and they are dangerous only to those who happen to get between them and their
reckoned safe spot.
CHAPTER 11
Consider the case of the female black leopard that escaped from the Zurich Zoo in the winter of 1933.
She was new to the zoo and seemed to get along with the male leopard. But various paw injuries
hinted at matrimonial strife. Before any decision could be taken about what to do, she squeezed
through a break in the roof bars of her cage and vanished in the night. The discovery that a wild
carnivore was free in their midst created an uproar among the citizens of Zurich. Traps were set and
hunting dogs were let loose. They only rid the canton of its few half-wild dogs. Not a trace of the
leopard was found for ten weeks. Finally, a casual labourer came upon it under a barn twenty-five
miles away and shot it. Remains of roe-deer were found nearby. That a big, black, tropical cat
managed to survive for more than two months in a Swiss winter without being seen by anyone, let
alone attacking anyone, speaks plainly to the fact that escaped zoo animals are not dangerous
absconding criminals but simply wild creatures seeking to fit in.
And this case is just one among many. If you took the city of Tokyo and turned it upside down
and shook it, you would be amazed at the animals that would fall out. It would pour more than cats
and dogs, I tell you. Boa constrictors, Komodo dragons, crocodiles, piranhas, ostriches, wolves, lynx,
wallabies, manatees, porcupines, orang-utans, wild boar—that’s the sort of rainfall you could expect
on your umbrella. And they expected to find—ha! In the middle of a Mexican tropical jungle, imagine!
Ha! Ha! It’s laughable, simply laughable. What were they thinking?
CHAPTER 12
At times he gets agitated. It’s nothing I say (I say very little). It’s his own story that does it.
Memory is an ocean and he bobs on its surface. I worry that he’ll want to stop. But he wants to tell
me his story. He goes on. After all these years, Richard Parker still preys on his mind.
He’s a sweet man. Every time I visit he prepares a South Indian vegetarian feast. I told him I
like spicy food. I don’t know why I said such a stupid thing. It’s a complete lie. I add dollop of
yogurt after dollop of yogurt. Nothing doing. Each time it’s the same: my taste buds shrivel up and
die, my skin goes beet red, my eyes well up with tears, my head feels like a house on fire, and my
digestive tract starts to twist and groan in agony like a boa constrictor that has swallowed a lawn
mower.
CHAPTER 13
So you see, if you fall into a lion’s pit, the reason the lion will tear you to pieces is not because it’s
hungry—be assured, zoo animals are amply fed—or because it’s bloodthirsty, but because you’ve
invaded its territory.
As an aside, that is why a circus trainer must always enter the lion ring first, and in full sight of
the lions. In doing so, he establishes that the ring is his territory, not theirs, a notion that he reinforces
by shouting, by stomping about, by snapping his whip. The lions are impressed. Their disadvantage
weighs heavily on them. Notice how they come in: mighty predators though they are, “kings of
beasts”, they crawl in with their tails low and they keep to the edges of the ring, which is always
round so that they have nowhere to hide. They are in the presence of a strongly dominant male, a
super-alpha male, and they must submit to his dominance rituals. So they open their jaws wide, they
sit up, they jump through paper-covered hoops, they crawl through tubes, they walk backwards, they
roll over. “He’s a queer one,” they think dimly. “Never seen a top lion like him. But he runs a good
pride. The larder’s always full and—let’s be honest, mates—his antics keep us busy. Napping all the
time does get a bit boring. At least we’re not riding bicycles like the brown bears or catching flying
plates like the chimps.”
Only the trainer better make sure he always remains super alpha. He will pay dearly if he
unwittingly slips to beta. Much hostile and aggressive behaviour among animals is the expression of
social insecurity. The animal in front of you must know where it stands, whether above you or below
you. Social rank is central to how it leads its life. Rank determines whom it can associate with and
how; where and when it can eat; where it can rest; where it can drink; and so on. Until it knows its
rank for certain, the animal lives a life of unbearable anarchy. It remains nervous, jumpy, dangerous.
Luckily for the circus trainer, decisions about social rank among higher animals are not always based
on brute force. Hediger (1950) says, “When two creatures meet, the one that is able to intimidate its
opponent is recognized as socially superior, so that a social decision does not always depend on a
fight; an encounter in some circumstances may be enough.” Words of a wise animal man. Mr. Hediger
was for many years a zoo director, first of the Basel Zoo and then of the Zurich Zoo. He was a man
well versed in the ways of animals.
It’s a question of brain over brawn. The nature of the circus trainer’s ascendancy is
psychological. Foreign surroundings, the trainer’s erect posture, calm demeanour, steady gaze,
fearless step forward, strange roar (for example, the snapping of a whip or the blowing of a whistle)
—these are so many factors that will fill the animal’s mind with doubt and fear, and make clear to it
where it stands, the very thing it wants to know. Satisfied, Number Two will back down and Number
One can turn to the audience and shout, “Let the show go on! And now, ladies and gentlemen, through
hoops of real fire ...”
CHAPTER 14
It is interesting to note that the lion that is the most amenable to the circus trainer’s tricks is the one
with the lowest social standing in the pride, the omega animal. It has the most to gain from a close
relationship with the super-alpha trainer. It is not only a matter of extra treats. A close relationship
will also mean protection from the other members of the pride. It is this compliant animal, to the
public no different from the others in size and apparent ferocity, that will be the star of the show,
while the trainer leaves the beta and gamma lions, more cantankerous subordinates, sitting on their
colourful barrels on the edge of the ring.
The same is true of other circus animals and is also seen in zoos. Socially inferior animals are
the ones that make the most strenuous, resourceful efforts to get to know their keepers. They prove to
be the ones most faithful to them, most in need of their company, least likely to challenge them or be
difficult. The phenomenon has been observed with big cats, bison, deer, wild sheep, monkeys and
many other animals. It is a fact commonly known in the trade.
CHAPTER 15