Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 20, 2018. It is now read-only.

Docs need some work #6

Open
marcuswhit opened this issue Feb 6, 2014 · 4 comments
Open

Docs need some work #6

marcuswhit opened this issue Feb 6, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@marcuswhit
Copy link

Aside from the obvious need of covering all operators, perhaps it would make them even more useful if there was an embedded Plunker/CodePen widget that demonstrates the functionality? Same point goes (and is likely even more relevant) for the RxJS docs.

@headinthebox
Copy link

Most certainly. Send in a pull request.

@bennage
Copy link

bennage commented Feb 7, 2014

I'd love to see this for the RxJS docs. 👍

@marcuswhit
Copy link
Author

I'll see if I can make a start in the next week. But yeah, rxjs docs are
probably more needed for most - coming from .net I'm often double checking
if the slightly different operators behave as I expect!
On 7 Feb 2014 20:31, "Christopher Bennage" [email protected] wrote:

I'd love to see this for the RxJS docs. [image: 👍]


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/6#issuecomment-34499078
.

@Roaders
Copy link

Roaders commented Jan 11, 2017

Yeah... the docs are really not much good...

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants