Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
You might find the #8236 discussion to be helpful. You bring up a great point about physical space versus image space. ITK has some great discussions on why registration must be performed in physical space (not image space). Hopefully we can get that in MONAI soon too. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Here is a CMU course on image registration : https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~galeotti/methods_course/ITK_Registration.pdf |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am trying to adapt the monai registration tutorials to my data. Briefly, my data is a collection of head MRI of different subjects and one reference atlas.
The first thing I observed is that my validation TRE improves, but the validation Dice does not. Trying to understand this, I realize the original tutorial is using images that all have been stripped of the original scanner coordinate system. The image affine matrices are identity. I applied the same "strip-scanner-coordinates" to my data, and now the validation dice improves during training.
Looking at other MONAI tutorials, it seems the moving and fixed always have an identity matrix as affine, or they have the same affine matrix. Even the GlobalNet example is not learning the affine matrix to align images in physical space/scanner coordinates.
Maybe I am confused because the ITK framework (ants/SimpleITK are based on ITK) typically finds transforms in "physical space" and MONAI finds transforms (DDF & affine) in "continuous index space".
Maybe it would be useful to have some tooling to convert "continuous index space" DDF or affine to "physical space"...?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions