refactored: src/screens/OrgSettings from Jest to Vitest(fixes: #2567) #2625
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve refactoring the test suite for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.test.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-102: Migration successfully maintains test integrityThe migration from Jest to Vitest has been implemented cleanly while:
- Preserving all test scenarios and assertions
- Maintaining proper test structure and organization
- Following testing-library best practices
- Keeping the same level of component coverage
This aligns well with the PR objectives of refactoring without adding new tests or changing functionality.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.test.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.test.tsx (4)
45-47: LGTM! Correct migration of Jest mocks to Vitest
The migration from jest.mock to vi.mock and jest.requireActual to vi.importActual is implemented correctly, maintaining the same mocking functionality for the router's useParams hook.
52-52: LGTM! Correct migration of cleanup method
The migration from jest.clearAllMocks to vi.clearAllMocks is implemented correctly in the afterAll hook.
5-5: Verify if location mocking is still needed
The removal of jest-location-mock is noted. If location mocking is still required for these tests, consider using Vitest's built-in location mocking capabilities or a compatible alternative.
✅ Verification successful
Removal of jest-location-mock import is appropriate
Since there are no location-related assertions, mocks, or manipulations in either the component or its test file, the removal of jest-location-mock import is correct and doesn't require any replacement in the Vitest migration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any location-related test assertions or mocks
rg -i "location|window\.location|history" "src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.tsx"
Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the test file itself for any location-related assertions or mocks
rg -i "location|window\.location|history" "src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.test.tsx"
# Also check for any location-related setup or cleanup in the test file
ast-grep --pattern 'beforeEach($$$)' "src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.test.tsx"
ast-grep --pattern 'afterEach($$$)' "src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.test.tsx"
Length of output: 255
Line range hint 55-102: Verify test coverage remains at 100%
The test implementation looks comprehensive, covering routing, component rendering, and user interactions. However, as per PR objectives, we need to verify that the test coverage remains at 100% after the migration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx (3)
Line range hint
19-49: Consider separating mocking logic from renderingThe helper function currently handles both mocking and rendering, which could make it harder to maintain and test different scenarios. Consider splitting these responsibilities:
-const renderOrganisationSettings = (link = link1, orgId = 'orgId'): void => { +const mockRouterParams = (orgId: string | undefined) => { vi.doMock('react-router-dom', async () => { const actual = await vi.importActual('react-router-dom'); return { ...actual, useParams: () => ({ orgId }), }; }); +}; +const renderOrganisationSettings = (link = link1, orgId = 'orgId'): void => { + mockRouterParams(orgId); render( // ... rest of the rendering logic ); };This separation would:
- Make it easier to test different routing scenarios
- Improve function reusability
- Make the code more maintainable
52-54: Consider using more specific mock restorationsInstead of restoring all mocks, consider restoring only the specific mocks used in each test. This provides better isolation and makes it clearer which mocks are being used.
- afterEach(() => { - vi.restoreAllMocks(); - }); + afterEach(() => { + vi.unmock('react-router-dom'); + });
Line range hint
95-122: Enhance test assertions for better coverageThe main test case could benefit from more specific assertions to ensure proper component behavior.
it('should render the organisation settings page', async () => { renderOrganisationSettings(); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByTestId('generalSettings')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByTestId('generalSettings')).toHaveTextContent('General Settings'); // ... other assertions }); userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('generalSettings')); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByTestId('generalTab')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByTestId('generalTab')).toBeVisible(); }); // ... rest of the test });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx (4)
1-18: LGTM! Imports and setup are properly migrated to Vitest
The import statements and initial setup are correctly organized, with appropriate testing utilities from Vitest replacing Jest equivalents.
124-137: LGTM! Dropdown test is well-structured
The dropdown test case is well-written with clear assertions and proper user interaction simulation.
56-87: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize the redirect test implementation
The current implementation re-imports the OrgSettings component unnecessarily and duplicates rendering logic.
it('should redirect to fallback URL if URL params are undefined', async () => {
- const useParamsMock = vi.fn(() => ({ orgId: undefined }));
- vi.doMock('react-router-dom', async () => {
- const actual = await vi.importActual('react-router-dom');
- return {
- ...actual,
- useParams: useParamsMock,
- };
- });
-
- const { default: OrgSettings } = await import('./OrgSettings');
-
- render(
- <MockedProvider addTypename={false}>
- <MemoryRouter initialEntries={['/orgsetting/']}>
- // ... rest of the providers
- </MockedProvider>,
- );
+ renderOrganisationSettings(link1, undefined);Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Line range hint 1-137: Verify test coverage meets requirements
The PR objectives specify maintaining 100% test coverage. While the tests appear comprehensive, please ensure all edge cases are covered:
- Error states in the settings tabs
- Network error scenarios
- Loading states
✅ Verification successful
Test coverage appears complete and well-structured
After analyzing the component and its tests:
- The component itself is relatively simple, mainly handling routing and tab switching
- The test file covers all main scenarios:
- Routing with valid and invalid
orgId - Rendering of all three settings tabs
- Tab switching functionality
- Dropdown menu functionality
- Routing with valid and invalid
- The component delegates complex functionality to child components (
GeneralSettings,OrgActionItemCategories,OrganizationAgendaCategory) - The only ignored coverage is a dropdown click handler marked with
/* istanbul ignore next */, which is redundant as the same functionality is tested via button clicks
The test coverage is appropriate for this component's responsibilities, as:
- There are no direct API calls in this component
- Error handling is delegated to child components
- Loading states are managed by child components
- All user interactions (tab switching, dropdown) are tested
- Route handling for missing
orgIdis tested
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test coverage for the OrgSettings component
# Look for any untested error handlers or loading states
ast-grep --pattern 'catch ($err) { $$$ }' src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.tsx
ast-grep --pattern 'loading ? $$$ : $$$' src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.tsx
Length of output: 166
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the file exists and see its content
fd OrgSettings.tsx$ --exec cat {}
# Also check for any loading or error states in the component's queries
rg -A 2 "useQuery|useMutation" src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.tsx
# Check test mocks to see what scenarios are covered
fd OrgSettings.mocks --exec cat {}
Length of output: 8033
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx (3)
19-27: Consider adding error handling for mock setupThe mock implementation is clean and follows Vitest best practices. However, consider adding error handling for the mock setup to make it more robust.
const mockRouterParams = (orgId: string | undefined): void => { vi.doMock('react-router-dom', async () => { + try { const actual = await vi.importActual('react-router-dom'); return { ...actual, useParams: () => ({ orgId }), }; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to mock router params:', error); + throw error; + } }); };
Line range hint
28-52: Add return type annotation for better type safetyThe render function implementation is solid, but could benefit from explicit return type annotation.
-const renderOrganisationSettings = (link = link1, orgId = 'orgId'): void => { +const renderOrganisationSettings = (link = link1, orgId = 'orgId'): ReturnType<typeof render> => { mockRouterParams(orgId); - render( + return render(
58-94: Consider consolidating import and mock setupThe redirection test has duplicate mock setup code. Consider extracting it to a helper function.
+const setupRedirectTest = async () => { + const useParamsMock = vi.fn(() => ({ orgId: undefined })); + await vi.doMock('react-router-dom', async () => { + const actual = await vi.importActual('react-router-dom'); + return { + ...actual, + useParams: useParamsMock, + }; + }); + return (await import('./OrgSettings')).default; +}; it('should redirect to fallback URL if URL params are undefined', async () => { - const useParamsMock = vi.fn(() => ({ orgId: undefined })); - vi.doMock('react-router-dom', async () => {...}); - const { default: OrgSettings } = await import('./OrgSettings'); + const OrgSettings = await setupRedirectTest();
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx (5)
1-18: LGTM: Imports are properly organized and updated for Vitest
The transition from Jest to Vitest is correctly reflected in the imports, maintaining all necessary testing utilities while adding Vitest-specific ones.
54-56: LGTM: Proper cleanup implementation
The cleanup using afterEach follows Vitest best practices for unmocking.
127-140: LGTM: Comprehensive dropdown testing
The dropdown test provides good coverage of the UI interaction and verification of dropdown items.
Line range hint 1-140: Verify test coverage metrics
The migration to Vitest appears successful. Let's verify the test coverage remains at 100% as per PR objectives.
✅ Verification successful
Test coverage configuration and implementation verified successfully
The verification shows:
- Coverage is properly configured in vitest.config.ts with Istanbul provider
- No skipped, disabled, or pending tests found
- All test cases are properly implemented with complete test bodies
- The test file maintains comprehensive coverage of the component's functionality including:
- URL parameter handling
- Component rendering
- User interactions
- Navigation scenarios
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for coverage configuration
rg -l "coverage" -g "*.{json,js,ts}"
# Check for any skipped or disabled tests
rg -e "skip\(" -e "skip:" -e "disabled" src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx
Length of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check coverage configuration in vitest config
cat vitest.config.ts
# Check test file for any pending or incomplete tests
ast-grep --pattern 'it.todo($_)' src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx
ast-grep --pattern 'it.skip($_)' src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx
ast-grep --pattern 'describe.skip($_)' src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx
# Check test implementation completeness
ast-grep --pattern 'it($_, $_) {
$$$
}' src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx
Length of output: 1247
Line range hint 97-125: Verify test coverage for error scenarios
While the happy path is well tested, consider adding tests for error scenarios.
Consider adding the following test cases:
- Network error handling
- Invalid organization ID
- Loading states
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx (5)
20-33: Consider improving error handling in mockRouterParamsWhile the error handling is good, logging to console in tests isn't ideal as it can clutter test output.
Consider this improvement:
} catch (error) { - console.error('Failed to mock router params:', error); throw error; }
67-78: Consider strengthening SetupRedirectTest assertionsThe setup function is well-structured, but consider adding type assertions for better type safety.
-const useParamsMock = vi.fn(() => ({ orgId: undefined })); +const useParamsMock = vi.fn<[], { orgId: undefined }>(() => ({ orgId: undefined }));
101-106: Consider adding timing assertionsWhen testing redirects, it's good practice to assert that the redirect happens within a reasonable timeframe.
-await waitFor(() => { +await waitFor(() => { const paramsErrorElement = screen.getByTestId('paramsError'); expect(paramsErrorElement).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(paramsErrorElement.textContent).toBe('Redirected to Home'); -}); +}, { timeout: 1000 });
139-152: Strengthen dropdown test assertionsThe new dropdown test is good but could be more thorough.
Consider adding these assertions:
// Verify dropdown is closed initially expect(screen.queryByRole('listbox')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); // After clicking userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('settingsDropdownToggle')); // Verify specific items and their order const items = screen.getAllByRole('button'); expect(items[0]).toHaveTextContent(/general/i); expect(items[1]).toHaveTextContent(/actionItemCategories/i); expect(items[2]).toHaveTextContent(/agendaItemCategories/i);
Test coverage needs attention for dropdown click handler
The test coverage is mostly complete, but there's an explicitly ignored test coverage area:
- The dropdown item's
onClickhandler is marked with/* istanbul ignore next */, but this functionality should be tested as it's a core interaction path.Current tests verify:
- Redirect behavior for missing orgId
- Rendering of all settings tabs
- Tab switching via main buttons
- Dropdown presence and item count
But missing:
- Tab switching via dropdown items, which is explicitly excluded from coverage
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-152: Verify test coverage meets PR requirementsThe PR objectives specify maintaining 100% test coverage after migration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for OrgSettings component # Search for coverage configuration echo "Checking coverage configuration..." rg -l "coverage" . # Search for any skipped or commented out tests echo "Checking for skipped tests..." rg -i "skip|todo|disabled" src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx # Search for untested component methods echo "Checking for potential untested methods..." ast-grep --pattern 'export default function OrgSettings() { $$$ }' src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.tsxLength of output: 545
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the coverage configuration and component implementation more thoroughly # Check coverage configuration in vitest config echo "Checking vitest coverage configuration..." cat vitest.config.ts # Examine the actual component implementation echo "Checking OrgSettings implementation..." cat src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.tsx # Look for any conditional renders or handlers that might need testing echo "Searching for conditional renders and handlers..." rg -A 3 "if|switch|case|handle|onClick|onChange" src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.tsxLength of output: 6976
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx (3)
1-14: LGTM: Imports successfully migrated to Vitest
The import statements have been correctly updated to use Vitest testing utilities while maintaining all necessary dependencies for the component testing.
Line range hint 34-60: LGTM: Render utility properly configured
The renderOrganisationSettings function is well structured with:
- Proper default parameters
- Complete provider hierarchy
- Correct routing setup
63-65: LGTM: Proper cleanup in afterEach
The cleanup of router mocks in afterEach ensures a clean state for each test.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring
Issue Number:
Fixes #2567
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not Relavant
Summary
This PR migrates the existing tests for OrgSetting.tsx from Jest to Vitest
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
OrgSettingscomponent for improved clarity and functionality.