Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Configure Automatic Labeling for Issues #2296

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

Sumitsh28
Copy link

@Sumitsh28 Sumitsh28 commented Sep 23, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Feature: Configures automatic labeling for issues.

Issue Number: Closes #2256

Did you add tests for your changes?

No. This change is related to GitHub Actions configuration and does not require unit tests.

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

No, documentation update is not required for this change.

Summary

This pull request updates the issue.yml file to configure automatic labeling of issues using the Renato66/auto-label GitHub action. The motivation behind this change is to reduce manual labeling effort and ensure that issues are labeled consistently based on their content. This automation will improve the efficiency of issue management by applying appropriate labels for dependencies, security, and design-related issues.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No, this PR does not introduce any breaking changes.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced issue labeling in GitHub Actions for better categorization of newly opened issues.
  • Refactor
    • Improved formatting and consistency in the issue greeting message.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration in the .github/workflows/issue.yml file. The on section for the issues event is now more specific, focusing on opened issues. Additionally, the job for labeling opened issues has been enhanced to support multiple labels for better categorization. Minor formatting adjustments were made to the greeting message without altering its content.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/issue.yml Updated on section to specify types as ['opened'], expanded labels input for categorization, and reformatted issue-message.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Automatic labeling for issues with specific keywords (e.g., dependencies) (2256) No specific keyword-based labeling logic implemented.
Maintain existing issue.yml file name (2256) The file name remains unchanged.
Ensure no other functionality is affected (2256) No additional functionality was altered.

Poem

In the garden of code, where issues bloom,
Labels now dance, dispelling the gloom.
With greetings that flow, like a soft, gentle stream,
Our workflow's a wonder, a coder's sweet dream! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bde0355 and 7ac3349.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/issue.yml (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/issue.yml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Sep 23, 2024
@Cioppolo14 Cioppolo14 removed the request for review from palisadoes September 23, 2024 12:10
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.54%. Comparing base (959399d) to head (bde0355).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2296   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    97.54%   97.54%           
========================================
  Files          241      241           
  Lines         6887     6887           
  Branches      2018     2016    -2     
========================================
  Hits          6718     6718           
  Misses         157      157           
  Partials        12       12           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Cioppolo14
Copy link

@Sumitsh28 Please fix the first comment so that each issue listed automatically closes. The PR_GUIDELINES.md file has details.

@Sumitsh28
Copy link
Author

@Cioppolo14 Done!

Copy link
Member

@varshith257 varshith257 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 26, 2024

@varshith257: I will review the changes.

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Sumitsh28

  1. You have not followed the approach in the issue.
  2. Please fix

@Sumitsh28
Copy link
Author

@palisadoes , can you please tell me what I missed?

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Your solution does not follow the recommended configuration by the GitHub Action's team

Copy link

This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-pr-activity No pull request activity label Oct 16, 2024
@noman2002
Copy link
Member

@Sumitsh28 Are you still working on this ?

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the no-pr-activity No pull request activity label Oct 18, 2024
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Closing. Inactivity

@palisadoes palisadoes closed this Oct 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants