-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 695
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Configure Automatic Labeling for Issues #2296
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2296 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 97.54% 97.54%
========================================
Files 241 241
Lines 6887 6887
Branches 2018 2016 -2
========================================
Hits 6718 6718
Misses 157 157
Partials 12 12 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@Sumitsh28 Please fix the first comment so that each issue listed automatically closes. The PR_GUIDELINES.md file has details. |
@Cioppolo14 Done! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@varshith257: I will review the changes. ✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- You have not followed the approach in the issue.
- Please fix
@palisadoes , can you please tell me what I missed? |
Your solution does not follow the recommended configuration by the GitHub Action's team |
This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work. |
@Sumitsh28 Are you still working on this ? |
Closing. Inactivity |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Feature: Configures automatic labeling for issues.
Issue Number: Closes #2256
Did you add tests for your changes?
No. This change is related to GitHub Actions configuration and does not require unit tests.
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No, documentation update is not required for this change.
Summary
This pull request updates the
issue.yml
file to configure automatic labeling of issues using theRenato66/auto-label
GitHub action. The motivation behind this change is to reduce manual labeling effort and ensure that issues are labeled consistently based on their content. This automation will improve the efficiency of issue management by applying appropriate labels for dependencies, security, and design-related issues.Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No, this PR does not introduce any breaking changes.
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit