Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Otter Browser #1956

Open
sjehuda opened this issue May 16, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Otter Browser #1956

sjehuda opened this issue May 16, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
DOC Pertains inclusively to the Documentation operations. enhancement Something we do have implemented already but needs improvement upon to the best of knowledge.

Comments

@sjehuda
Copy link

sjehuda commented May 16, 2022

What’s missing?
Otter Browser from @Emdek
https://openuserjs.org/about/Otter

Why?
Because it supports Userscripts.

Links
https://otter-browser.org/
https://github.com/OtterBrowser

logo

@sjehuda sjehuda added the enhancement Something we do have implemented already but needs improvement upon to the best of knowledge. label May 16, 2022
@Martii Martii added the DOC Pertains inclusively to the Documentation operations. label May 18, 2022
@Martii
Copy link
Member

Martii commented May 18, 2022

Thanks... once jammy is supported it will be double checked for .user.js support. I seem to recall a few years back it was broken... but times can change.

It's been a while since I've retested Otter out but the "unoffical ppa" has to support current dev station first.

Ref(s):

@sjehuda
Copy link
Author

sjehuda commented Mar 1, 2023

There's an attention to userscript, though I'm not sure whether it's working.

I'm able to install userscripts, but I didn't manage to make them to work.
I might be doing something wrong.

@Emdek, may you please share the current status of userscript support for Otter?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DOC Pertains inclusively to the Documentation operations. enhancement Something we do have implemented already but needs improvement upon to the best of knowledge.
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants