You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As Open Terms Archive continues to evolve, we're currently confronted to the question of which metadata should be attached to records and in which way. So we're opening a discussion on this subject to best adapt the record metadata handling to serve the diverse needs of the project's various environments.
We're curious to hear about any challenges you've encountered or any specific needs you've identified regarding metadata. Which information you've found lacking and in which contexts, for which usages?
In our side, for instance, during our research on how to recover from errors in the version history, we realized the value of embedding engine version as technical metadata for better traceability. This metadata for example could allow to fix errors in history that was only present on some engine versions.
Additionally, it seems that some of you have already have encounter the need to add the terms location at the beginning of versions, as seen in this example.
It could be interesting to know what was the need here?
From these two examples, it appears that there are two primary types of metadata: technical metadata, which describe the technical aspects of a record (for example: engine version, browser used to fetch the record, geolocation of the server, …), and content metadata, which offer context and additional information about the content itself (for example: URL where the content was fetched, selectors used to get the content, …).
We believe that these two kinds of metadata could be very useful and they probably be handle differently to optimize uses.
So, we invite you to share your needs and your thoughts about records metadata!
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi everyone,
As Open Terms Archive continues to evolve, we're currently confronted to the question of which metadata should be attached to records and in which way. So we're opening a discussion on this subject to best adapt the record metadata handling to serve the diverse needs of the project's various environments.
We're curious to hear about any challenges you've encountered or any specific needs you've identified regarding metadata. Which information you've found lacking and in which contexts, for which usages?
In our side, for instance, during our research on how to recover from errors in the version history, we realized the value of embedding engine version as technical metadata for better traceability. This metadata for example could allow to fix errors in history that was only present on some engine versions.
Additionally, it seems that some of you have already have encounter the need to add the terms location at the beginning of versions, as seen in this example.
It could be interesting to know what was the need here?
From these two examples, it appears that there are two primary types of metadata: technical metadata, which describe the technical aspects of a record (for example: engine version, browser used to fetch the record, geolocation of the server, …), and content metadata, which offer context and additional information about the content itself (for example: URL where the content was fetched, selectors used to get the content, …).
We believe that these two kinds of metadata could be very useful and they probably be handle differently to optimize uses.
So, we invite you to share your needs and your thoughts about records metadata!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions