-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
List of stemma already in the base #10
Comments
I'd say yes, because it might be interesting for, e.g., epistemological purposes. Of course, it also means that serial studies on tradition will have to pick for themselves. And, the more we talk, the closer the need of an actual database comes forth. Perhaps we can get away with a good naming policy ? |
I think we should accept different stemmas for the same text. |
I agree ! Ok, so, basically, we just need a script (ideally, one that runs with every PR) to check metadata and create a list of existing stemmata. |
VIAF number is the one of the work or a specific edition? It is pretty unclear… Because if there is always a VIAF number for an edition (held in a library), there is not always one for a work |
Btw: Viaf is unstable, espacially for author's names. We should ISNI |
For the work. |
For author's names, I haven't heard of ISNI before. I think VIAF should be good enough for our purposes, but I don't mind, whatever you consider best. |
Many people have discovered that VIAF is not stable and it is true: it is not. Only ISNI is. VIAF is a stock exchange between libraries before final reconciliation. |
I personally don't care ! I'll do as you choose. |
We need to find a way to produce a list of stemma in the base, not to have several times the same text. Which raises a question: do we accept different stemmas for a single text?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: