Implement API for FieldSet, Field, ScalarField, VectorField etc

[erikvansebille]

No description provided.

[fluidnumerics-joe]

Hey all, with this API settling in, should we discuss concrete tasks to adapt to the new fieldset and field . I suppose something similar to @willirath 's trimmed down implementation would be appropriate but it's possible I missed some conversations around this. @VeckoTheGecko , what do you think ?

[VeckoTheGecko]

@fluidnumerics-joe I think that this is important to discuss. Just tuning back into parcels dev over the next couple days - I want to get a grasp on xgcm to (a) make sure I haven't missed anything and (b) see if there are any ideas that can help guide our development.

At this point, I'm not sure what those concrete tasks would look like (since its dependent on what I discover this week from xgcm). Do you have any thoughts on it from your side?

[fluidnumerics-joe]

I started to get some things out of my head here : Parcels v4

@willirath has a good start (IMO) of a trimmed down FieldSet in main...v/mvp-dependency-discovery . Would it make sense to build off of the work in this branch ?

[willirath]

I'm not too proud of thev/mvp-dependency-discovery branch :) But something along these lines should be done.