You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When multiple parties contribute to funding a validator, it's not currently possible to split the principal into multiple parties. We should mimic the behaviour we have now for rewardAddress on principalAddress, ensuring safety and minimizing the risk of losing funds.
🛠️ Proposed solution
Investigate how to allow splitting the principal between different parties when funding a validator, considering the safety concerns and potential risks involved.
Determine the feasibility of implementing such a feature within the existing Splits contract architecture while maintaining high security and reliability.
Design and document the proposed solution, including contract modifications and user flows, with a focus on ensuring that the process is foolproof and minimizes the risk of losing funds.
This proposed solution aims to provide more flexibility and options for validators funded by multiple parties, allowing them to distribute the principal according to their specific needs and agreements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
boulder225
changed the title
Spike how to provide more flexibility and options for validators funded by multiple parties
split the principal into multiple parties when multiple parties contribute to funding a validator
May 16, 2024
boulder225
changed the title
split the principal into multiple parties when multiple parties contribute to funding a validator
Split the principal into multiple parties when multiple parties contribute to funding a validator
May 16, 2024
boulder225
changed the title
Split the principal into multiple parties when multiple parties contribute to funding a validator
Split the principal into multiple parties when they contribute to funding a validator
May 16, 2024
🎯 Problem to be solved
When multiple parties contribute to funding a validator, it's not currently possible to split the principal into multiple parties. We should mimic the behaviour we have now for
rewardAddress
onprincipalAddress
, ensuring safety and minimizing the risk of losing funds.🛠️ Proposed solution
This proposed solution aims to provide more flexibility and options for validators funded by multiple parties, allowing them to distribute the principal according to their specific needs and agreements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: