Clarification on Typographical Inconsistencies in Terminology #17
Unanswered
CyberVarun
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I noticed some typographical inconsistencies in the terminology across the documentation, and I wanted to clarify the intended usage. Below are the cases I found, along with example images:
1. Device-Internal Elements vs. Device-External Elements:
Instances of "device-internal" and "device-external" appear with inconsistent hyphenation (e.g., "device-internal and device-external").

Example:
2. Digital In- and Outputs:
The term "digital in- and outputs" appears with this phrasing. Is this the intended style, or should it be "digital inputs and outputs"?

Example:
3. Hyphenation Usage in Internal and External:
Variations such as "device-internal and -external" vs. "device internal and device external" are used interchangeably.

Example:
4. Consistency Across Documentation:
Some documents use "device-internal and device-external" while others omit the hyphen (e.g., "device internal").

Example:
Could you confirm the correct and consistent terminology to ensure the documentation remains clear and professional?
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions