You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
docs/INSTALLATION.md should probably recommend the .deb distributed by Debian instead of the generic stuff produced by make deb. It should provide a better experience to end users because it is maintained by humans (and robots, for example with regular rebuild tests). The changes that I have recently suggested for the desktop file are a good example.
If a contributor wants to build a local .deb, they should clone https://salsa.debian.org/debian/nanovna-saver/ (a fork adding the debian/ subdirectory) and run gbp buildpackage.
As far as I can see (I am using pyproject.toml, not Astral UV), src/tools/ is installed into the wheel alongside src/NanoVNASaver/. This is probably unwanted, as this directory is only used at build time and its name is too generic for system-wide installation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello.
docs/INSTALLATION.md
should probably recommend the.deb
distributed by Debian instead of the generic stuff produced bymake deb
. It should provide a better experience to end users because it is maintained by humans (and robots, for example with regular rebuild tests). The changes that I have recently suggested for the desktop file are a good example.If a contributor wants to build a local
.deb
, they should clonehttps://salsa.debian.org/debian/nanovna-saver/
(a fork adding thedebian/
subdirectory) and rungbp buildpackage
.As far as I can see (I am using
pyproject.toml
, not Astral UV),src/tools/
is installed into the wheel alongsidesrc/NanoVNASaver/
. This is probably unwanted, as this directory is only used at build time and its name is too generic for system-wide installation.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: