Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bug: NanoVNA-Saver version 7.0 -marker setting #790

Open
PA3CCE opened this issue Feb 8, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

bug: NanoVNA-Saver version 7.0 -marker setting #790

PA3CCE opened this issue Feb 8, 2025 · 5 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@PA3CCE
Copy link

PA3CCE commented Feb 8, 2025

Bug Report

NanoVNA-Saver version:
Version 7.0

Current behavior:
Marker(s) can't be set to a desired frequency.

After starting NanoVNA-Saver and connecting it to my device "LiteVNA", all 3 markers in the main window are set to 200MHz.
When I select a marker, set it for the desired frequency and confirm the setting by "Enter" or select another marker to set, the marker that was set returns to the default setting of 200MHz.

Expected behaviour;
It should be possible to set the markers individually to a desired frequency.

@PA3CCE PA3CCE added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 8, 2025
@PA3CCE
Copy link
Author

PA3CCE commented Feb 9, 2025

OK, I see now, after sweeping you can select a marker and position it on the screen, the frequency set for is shown in the main window.
Setting the frequency manually before the sweep would be nice but is not a real issue.

@zarath
Copy link
Collaborator

zarath commented Feb 9, 2025

I haven't found out why it doesn't accept input a start, but I was able to enter values, after changing the radiobuttons beside the marker input fields.

@PA3CCE
Copy link
Author

PA3CCE commented Feb 9, 2025

OK, but you can set ONE marker only, after setting it and selecting the next marker to set, the previous one returns to the default value (200MHz).

@zarath
Copy link
Collaborator

zarath commented Feb 10, 2025

Even this is more or less random... It seems if you change radiobuttons some more times it works prior scanning or loading of data.

@PA3CCE
Copy link
Author

PA3CCE commented Feb 10, 2025

Yes correct, when you set a marker and click on it's radiiobuton several times, you can set the next one without the impact on the first one, strange.
I have seen more proofs of instability of the software !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants