You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the JSON schema generation, when a facet is included (e.g. enum), it is only bringing that data constraint's values.
For example, an enum might have the value: VA, NC, and SC. But it would be nice to include their definitions as well, which are Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, respectively.
These definitions also exist for other facets besides enum, such as pattern, maxInclusive, minInclusive, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the JSON schema generation, when a facet is included (e.g. enum), it is only bringing that data constraint's values.
For example, an enum might have the value: VA, NC, and SC. But it would be nice to include their definitions as well, which are Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, respectively.
These definitions also exist for other facets besides enum, such as pattern, maxInclusive, minInclusive, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: