Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set up / update EML validator web servlet for 2.2.0 #348

Open
amoeba opened this issue Oct 21, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Set up / update EML validator web servlet for 2.2.0 #348

amoeba opened this issue Oct 21, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@amoeba
Copy link
Contributor

amoeba commented Oct 21, 2019

During a discussion with @mobb on NCEAS/#eml today, she expressed that having the old web validator back for EML 2.2.0 would be super handy for the community. There are other ways to validate EML records, including the R package and checking out this repo and running the validate script in ./bin but those aren't nearly as accessible as a simple web page.

I think we mostly all agree but need to pencil out the details:

  • Yay? Nay?

  • Location: Historically is/was https://knb.ecoinformatics.org/emlparser/. Should we just plop the new one in place here?

    If I was setting this up from scratch, I'd probably lobby for the location to be eml.ecoinformatics.org/validate but that looks hard to do with our Netlify deployment unless I'm mistaken.

  • Link this into documentation?

@amoeba amoeba self-assigned this Oct 21, 2019
@mbjones
Copy link
Member

mbjones commented Oct 22, 2019

We can;t deploy under Netlify, which is why I skipped it in the first place.

Today I updated https://knb.ecoinformatics.org/emlparser/ to use the new EML 2.2.0 build, so it should now work against all versions of EML.

@amoeba
Copy link
Contributor Author

amoeba commented Oct 22, 2019

Thanks, @mbjones. I think it'd be good to include a link in the readme at the top along with the other links we provide. Sound good?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants