-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Add logo gallery of open source projects VEDA integrates and promotes #205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I made something like this a year ago that could be used as a starting place: https://github.com/NASA-IMPACT/veda-analytics/issues/102#issuecomment-2089000728 https://excalidraw.com/#room=8a6aaa75dbb0e2638b73,5Sb-oy551Y_XLLwz9P32bQ |
tl;dr: I don't think we need to separate / stratify the libraries I am trying to make sense of how this is organized 😅 ... In the top section it looks like there is some kind of dimensionality from left to right. So nd is on the left and then rasters are in the middle and vectors are on the right. Then in the middle section vertically it looks like analytics tools that you would use with any datatype. And the bottom is maybe where you work (not sure why ipyleaflet is down there). But to your broader question I think it's easy to spend a lot of time trying to organize these logo clouds. I guess the usefulness of that exercise depends on the intended audience. If it's just to say "we promote these projects" then you don't really need structure. And if it's to say, "we recommend lonboard for visualizing vector data" then there is probably a more obvious way of saying that. |
Thanks for this reasoning. Yes, listing the promoted projects is basically it. 😄 |
A logo gallery makes it very tangible that VEDA is an ecosystem of high quality projects.
We should include such a gallery in our docs, ideally on the welcome page, to underline and illustrate the goal of VEDA of integrating community solutions.
We have some of them here: https://docs.openveda.cloud/veda-project/why.html, but should have it in a more prominent place
Acceptance criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: