Skip to content

SPDX License: Project Not REUSE-Compliant - Missing License Information #649

@re2zero

Description

@re2zero

The recent reuse lint scan shows the project does not comply with the REUSE Specification 3.3.

# SUMMARY

* Bad licenses: 0
* Deprecated licenses: 0
* Licenses without file extension: 0
* Missing licenses: 0
* Unused licenses: 0
* Used licenses: 0
* Read errors: 0
* Files with copyright information: 97 / 174
* Files with license information: 0 / 174

Unfortunately, your project is not compliant with version 3.3 of the REUSE Specification :-(

Key issues:

0/174 files contain license information (SPDX identifiers), despite 97 files having copyright notices.

Non-compliance risks legal ambiguity and hinders downstream adoption.

Suggested Fix:
Add SPDX license identifiers to all files (e.g., // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later).

Benefits of SPDX Compliance:

✅ Simplifies compliance for users and contributors.

✅ Machine-readable metadata ensures automated tooling compatibility.

✅ Reduces legal risk by eliminating ambiguity.

Use the reuse tool (guide) to automate fixes. Let me know if you'd like help drafting a PR!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions