Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

alternative needed to --user installation #11

Open
johannct opened this issue Oct 6, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

alternative needed to --user installation #11

johannct opened this issue Oct 6, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@johannct
Copy link

johannct commented Oct 6, 2020

currently the prescribed usage of sn_pipe is to build the pipeline via the custom script pip_sn_pack.py, which hardcodes call to pip with the option --user. I think that a production installation will need to avoid installing packages in a user dependent local area.
@johannct
Copy link
Author

johannct commented Oct 6, 2020

Here is a setup that I used to build a local install out of .local, but it does not run anymore with the pip_sn_pack.py machinery
setup.py.txt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@johannct