Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

bruteforce tests missing functions on master #507

Open
2 of 4 tasks
kpet opened this issue Dec 1, 2019 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #2251
Open
2 of 4 tasks

bruteforce tests missing functions on master #507

kpet opened this issue Dec 1, 2019 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #2251
Labels
missing-coverage mobica-backlog Issue approved by WG for Mobica to work on waiting_for_feedback Waiting for feedback/information

Comments

@kpet
Copy link
Contributor

kpet commented Dec 1, 2019 •
edited by bashbaug
Loading

It seems some built-in functions that were tested with the version on cl12_trunk are no longer tested with the master branch version. Here are a few I could spot:

We should review the full list against the spec.
@gwawiork
Copy link
Contributor

Partially fixed by #1289

@kpet kpet added the mobica-triage Issue proposed for addition to Mobica's backlog (needs WG approval) label Jan 8, 2025
@neiltrevett neiltrevett added mobica-backlog Issue approved by WG for Mobica to work on and removed mobica-triage Issue proposed for addition to Mobica's backlog (needs WG approval) labels Jan 21, 2025
@shajder
Copy link
Contributor

shajder commented Jan 27, 2025

@svenvh do you know if the concern behind tgamma precision is already sorted out ? Thanks

@svenvh
Copy link
Member

svenvh commented Jan 27, 2025

@svenvh do you know if the concern behind tgamma precision is already sorted out ?

There hasn't been any discussion on this as far as I'm aware. Perhaps we should create a draft PR to enable tgamma in the test so that vendors can check how realistic the ULP requirement is for their implementations?

@shajder shajder linked a pull request Jan 28, 2025 that will close this issue
Draft
@ewagalamon ewagalamon added in_development Mobica is currently working on this waiting_for_feedback Waiting for feedback/information and removed waiting_for_feedback Waiting for feedback/information labels Feb 4, 2025
@ewagalamon ewagalamon added waiting_for_feedback Waiting for feedback/information and removed in_development Mobica is currently working on this labels Feb 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
missing-coverage mobica-backlog Issue approved by WG for Mobica to work on waiting_for_feedback Waiting for feedback/information
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Enabled tgamma test for bruteforce suite shajder/OpenCL-CTS
6 participants
@kpet @svenvh @shajder @neiltrevett @gwawiork @ewagalamon