Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Update on PYPI #137

Open
Kalebu opened this issue Sep 16, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

New Update on PYPI #137

Kalebu opened this issue Sep 16, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@Kalebu
Copy link
Owner

Kalebu commented Sep 16, 2023

Pushed upgrade on PYPI (2.61) ----------------------------

Just pushed a new update to Pypi with most of the issues fixed including but not limited to

  • find_by_username xpath
  • sending_pictures xpath
  • sending_videos xpath
  • sending_documents xpath

Please upgrade your package to use the latest changes

pip install ---upgrade alright
@giulio333
Copy link

Hi! Just updated but but I got this error:

line 16, in validate_response
raise ValueError(f"There is no such driver by url {resp.url}")
ValueError: There is no such driver by url https://chromedriver.storage.googleapis.com/LATEST_RELEASE_116.0.5845

@giulio333
Copy link

giulio333 commented Sep 18, 2023

Just solved with "pip install --upgrade webdriver-manager" to version 4.0.0

@alexferra
Copy link

alexferra commented Sep 20, 2023

@Kalebu
error on get_last_message_received

alright_init_.py", line 732, in get_last_message_received
EC.presence_of_all_elements_located(
TypeError: presence_of_all_elements_located() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given

I think solution is just to include ()

@Kalebu
Copy link
Owner Author

Kalebu commented Sep 20, 2023

@Kalebu error on get_last_message_received

alright__init__.py", line 732, in get_last_message_received EC.presence_of_all_elements_located( TypeError: presence_of_all_elements_located() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given

I think solution is just to include ()

Thank you for picking up this, Fixed, will be included in the next PYPI upgrade

@leggewie
Copy link
Contributor

leggewie commented Oct 3, 2023

Thank you for your work on alright!

Two comments, I would like to make

  • it is utterly unclear what codebase on PyPi relates to what git version or commit. can that be improved?
  • please read http://semver.org (releasing version 2.61 as a bug fix to version 2.6 is not a good idea)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants