Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please compare the speed and quality of results of pure julia packages (evotrees example) #989

Open
MrBenzWorld opened this issue Nov 19, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@MrBenzWorld
Copy link

MLJ is best, i have started learning julia beacuse of MLJ. it is good ,and i appriciate it.
I would like to use pure julia pakages ( grading boosting packages , Ex: Evotrees)

Please , use some real dataset ( Ex : which are avaible Kaggle, House pricing .etc..)
Please use EvoTrees with MLJ , optmize it (TreeParzen is not working ). show the speed and quality of results.
I would like to use pure julia codes for my research work. But im not getting better results.
Please add some example with pure julia packages (MLJ+EvoTrees+TreeParzen ..etc) and compare results quality. you have lot examples but did not comapare.

Please help,
Thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant